Book Title: Study in the Origins and Development of Jainism Author(s): S N Shrivastava Publisher: Rekha Publication GorakhpurPage 77
________________ 64 Socio-Cultural Milieu (1) arhatas, (2) yaudhãs as according to Pañchavim sa Brāhmaṇa. The term yaudhaḥ clearly denotes the class of warriors. Bhandarkar and many others following him have equated arhatãs with Brāhmaṇas, but this conjecture is not maintainable. The term arhata is typically a Śramana term and has a specific connotation. Arhata is an honourable term and is applied to such persons who have either attained salvation or reached the stage of salvation in the Jain and Buddhist traditions. The equation of arhatas and yaudhãs of the vratya community with the Brāhmaṇas and Kshatriyas of the orthodox society is misleading. It is significant to note that the classification of the vratya community into yaudhas and arhatas has a great bearing on the cultural history of India. Coming from the same stock, the arhatas, like the Brahmaņas, were men who were spiritual seekers while the yaudhãs, like the Kshatriyas, were engaged in managing the mundane affairs. Both these groups constituted the vratya rajanya class. There is no trace of the division of the vratya community into Brāhmaṇa, Vaisya and Śūdra categories in the early literature. The classification of the vratyas in these categories is a later development when people coming from different stocks were included in these categories opposed to Vedic orthodoxy. Infact, the arhatas as a category of the vratyas belonging to Śramaṇa tradition had a definite religious ideology and were wandering ascetics. Their weltanschauung was opposed to the Vedic outlooks. Since the arhatas were related with Śramana tradition and belonged to the rajanya class, it is quite reasonable to conclude that Jainism developed from the institution of these arhatas. This inference gets support from another reference of the Panchaviṁsa Brahmaṇa in which it is stated that the vratyas were divided into four classes, namely, hīna, gargira, samanichmedhra and nindita. In the opinion of R. N. Dandekar the categories of gargira and samanichamedhra indicate close relatioship between Rudra and thePage Navigation
1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162