________________
community in the whole Hill were fully recognis. ed by the direction in clause 2 that "the use of any part of the Hill in manner opposed to the tenets of the Shravak community is prohibited."
The present trouble was thus bound to arise in this year of grace 1926, full forty years after the last settlement. The immediate occasion for the present difficulty has, however, its own particular history. In 1921 the Jain community were carrying out certain repairs and were cleansing tanks, when the chief Karbbari of the State issued certain orders likely to interfere with the internal management of the property. Orders were also issued with regard to the custody,' and management of the small temple of Mahadev within the 'Gadh,' although in the investigation undertaken in 187577, and the orders passed thereon that temple was held to be under the control of the Jains. The orders of the chief Karbhari in those matters on the face of them exhibit such lack of restraint and courtesy as to make it clear that he was determined to disturb the situation once again and revive the previous position of mutual hostility and distrust.
OWNERSHIP OF THE FORT.
Because in the Government Orders it is said that "within the Gadh :" no
