________________
31
money and in kind. When the forty years' agreement expired on April 1st last, the Thakore petitioned to the Agent to the GovernorGeneral in the States of Western India, in which he claimed a right to levy through its own agency a pilgrim tax at Rs. 2 per head per outside pilgrim, and Rs. 5 per annum per Shrawak residing in Palitana, presumably quite apart from their going on pilgrimage or not. He has also adduced in support of his contention a quotation from the Montford Report (para. 297) in which it is stated "It (i.e. paramount power) intervenes when the internal peace of their (Indian States) territories is seriously threatened. The contention of the Thakore is untenable, all the more because all through the past, whenever a dispute of this kind has arisen, the Durbar have submitted to the intervention of the supreme authority in the land. The reliance on that para. in the Montford Report is utterly besides the point, since that paragraph contemplates the purely internal affairs between a State and its own subjects; while in this matter are involved the rights of the Jain community, a majority of whom are British subjects, owing no allegiance of any sort whatever to the State of Palitana. In the circumstances it seems insupportable, in the 'extreme, that the Palitana Durbar should claim the sovereign right on the Hill even against those members of the Jain community, who own the
