Book Title: Path of Arhat
Author(s): T U Mehta
Publisher: Sohanlal Smarak Parshwanath Shodhpitha Varanasi

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 179
________________ 154 ) The Path of Arhat : A Religious Democracy persisted. And it is this, that the Jaina tradition believes that every type of violence whether at individual level or at social level, is the sign of spiritual weakness and hence whenever violence is required to be used, it is a matter of atonement. On the other hand, though the Vedic tradition is in agreement with the Jaina tradition so far as the observation of Ahinsa at individual level concerned, it is clear in 1 claiming that whenever social or public issues are concerned, it is wrong to believe violence is always a sign of spiritual weakness. On the contrary, in special circumstances in public life violence is not only necessary but is also a sign of strength and hence no question of atonement arises." Though, as will be presently seen, Jainism is not against the use of violence if it becomes inevitable, the analysis of Pt. Sukhalalaji is logically perfect because, as we shall have an occasion to discuss elsewhere, the Jaina philosophy, being on the line of 'Sramana' traditions, is based on the principle of 'Nivịtti', i, e., 'retirement, while the Vedic philosophy is based on the principle of 'Pravștti', i. e., 'activity. One aiming at total retirement from worldly affairs would necessarily have an individual approach while the one who aims at activity would necessarily have a social approach. Both the approaches are necessary in life so long as one lives in the society, but a stage comes in the life of everyone when he has to retire fully from all worldly activities social as well as individual, in which event, his approach would be only individual. That individual approach being purely spiritual, does not conflict with social or public interests --- contrarily it supplements social interests. Even Vedic tradition is conscious about this as is clear from its conceptions of 'Grhasthaśrama' (Stage of a house-holder ) and final 'Samnyástháśrama' (Stage of total renunciation ) in the life of a man. Thus basically, the apparent distinction which is pointed out by Pt. Sukhalālaji?, fades into insignificance. 1. Pt. Sukhalalaji is of the opinion that Samnyāsthāśrama Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262