Book Title: Panchratre Jayakhya Samhita
Author(s): Embar Krishnamacharya
Publisher: Orental Institute

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 34
________________ Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra www.kobatirth.org Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir (1) FROM DOCTRINAL VIEWPOINT. 29 Next, in the Jayākhyasaṁhită, as has been said already we meet with the directions for attaining the Yakşiņīsiddhi. This is very important as it affords further materials for comparison in order to be helpful in determining the age of the work, This very topic of Yakşinīsādhana also appears in the Bhutadāmaratantraż where Sadhanas for Yakşipīs are given along with those of the Bhutinīs, Năginis, Vidyadharis, Kätyāyanīs. Kinnarīs and so forth. In the Bhútaļāmaratantra the number of Yakşiņis is recorgnized as eight and they are named as Surasundari, Manohārini, Kanakamati, Kāmeśvarī, Ratipriyā, Padmini, Nați and Anuragini. When compared with the Bhūtaļāmaratantra the Jayākhyasamhită seems to present an earlier stage of thought inasmuch as though the Yakşipis do appear in the latter, the others, namely, the Bhutinis, Apsarasas, etc. who are closely associated with the Yakşiņīs are completely absent. There is one more reason why the Jayākhyasambita should be earlier. While describing the advantages to be gained through the enchantinent of the Yaksinīs, the Dināras are mentioned as miraculously coming from them in large quantities in the Bhútadãınaratantra, but in the Jayākhya though the advantages are similarly enumerated the Dināras are not mentioned at all. This shows that the Jayākhya is earlier than the Bhůta lämaratantra which has been placed in the beginning of the seventh century. Therefore Jayākhya must be still earlier, sometime at least before the Dīnāras 1. op. cit. p. 294. 2. Bhútadámaratantra ( Hindu ), 11th Patala (Buddhist ), 8th Kalpa. Both these are unpublished and original Mes are preserved in the Library of the Oriental Institute, Baroda. A paper on the Cult of Bhútadâmara has been contributed before the Patna Session of the Oriental Conference where the two versions have been compared, and their dates discussed. 3. See remarks in the previous footnote. 4. B. Bhattacharyya : The calt of Bhūtāda mara read before the Patna Oriental Conference, 1930. For the historicity of docaments mentioning the Dināras, see Bühler: The Laws of Manu, Introduction, pp. xvii; cv, cvii. For Private and Personal Use Only

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 ... 588