Jainas in History of Indian Literature

Author(s): Jinvijay
Publisher: ZZZ Unknown

Page 59

44} JAỊNAS IN INDIAN LITERATURE :: Nītiv, p. 125 : STÅR 1977 Aarhagna: una millor FARAH TE PĘT AT naycha Kaut. p. 68f: fugiat हि ज्यायसा हस्तिना पादयुद्धसिवाभ्युपैति । समेन चामं पात्रमामेनाहतमिवोभयतः
tai
Nītiv. p. 128: parauf rat gitarat: gara AJAOPERTI Kaut. p. 154: Genant at VAETT VET I ERAP: GATTI
The list of the eight forms of marriage in Nitiv. p. 129 is the same as Kaut. p. 151, but Somade va give more details.
Though ķautilya is so extensively quoted, his name is not mentioned in the Nītivāķyömrta, The name of Cāņa ky a occurs only once, not aş a teacher, however, but only as an example in the Dūtasamuddeśa (p. 52), as having killed Nandą by making use of a tīkşņadūta. Very interesting are the definitions of the different kinds of spies in the Cārasamuddeśa ( pp. 53-56). The list is longer than in the Kauțiliya (parallel passages given by Jolly 1. c. p. 374). How independent Somadeva, in spite of verbal agreement is from Kauțilya, may be seen by a comparison of the a māty otpatti (Kauţ, p. 13 ) with the amātyasamuddeśa (Nītiv pp. 67-75). Some of the most important differences between the Nītivākyāmrta and the Kautiliya have already been pointed out by Professor Jolly (1. c. 377 f.). Like the Smộtis the Nītiv. (p. 100 ff) knows the ordeals as part of the judicial procedure, while they are not mentioned at all by Kautilya. The list of the twelve kinds of sons in Nītiv, p. 135 agrees more with Manusmrti 9, 159. than with Kaut. p. 146. The examples of queens who mur