Book Title: Jaina View of Life
Author(s): T G Kalghatgi
Publisher: Jain Sanskruti Samrakshak Sangh Solapur

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 125
________________ 110 Jaina View of Life assimilated in the Brāhmaṇa thought by the time the Upanişads were clearly formulated. The Indian view of Karma was doubtless of non-Aryan provinance, and it was a kind of a natural law. Transmigration of the soul was perhaps one of the oldest forms in which the belief in the after-life was held. Karma was closely linked with this doctrine. With the gradual emphasis of asceticism under the influence of the Sramaņa culture, came the awareness of one's responsibility to shape one's personality here and here-after. However, the doctrine has been widely accepted in ancient Indian thought, except for the Cārvāka. In the Samnyāsa Upanişad we are told that the Jivas are bound by Karma.18 A man becomes good by good deeds and bad by bad deeds; and while thus we live, we fetter ourselves with the effect of our deeds. In the Mahabharata, the emphasis is on the force of Karma. Of the three kinds of Karma, prārabdha, samcita and agami mentioned in the Bhagavadgita, agāmi and samcita can be overcome by knowledge. In Buddhism, as there is no substance as soul, wnat transmigrates is not a person but his Karma. When the series of mental states which constitutes the self resulting from a chain of acts ends, there would still be some acts and their effects which continue; and the vijñāna projects into the future due to the force of the effects of Karma. The Buddhists distinguish acts accompanied by asrava impure acts) from pure acts which are not accompanied by aśrava. Saṁsāra is the effect of Karma. Our present happiness and misery are the fruit of what we have ourselves done in the past. Operation of Karma can be considered as a principle of moral life, as force limiting and particularising personality and as a principle of conservation of energy in the physical world." But Buddhism maintains that involuntary actions, whether of body, speech and mind, do not constitute 12. Ninism Smart: Doctrine and Argument in Indian Philosophy, (Allen and Unwin) (1964); p. 163. 13. Samnyâsa Upani şad : II 28; Karmaā badhyate jantuḥ. 14. Brhadāraṇyaka Up. iii, 2, 13. 15. Yamakami Sogen: Systems of Buddhist Philosophy (1912) pp. 50-66. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260