________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.org
L
Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir
would have been obliged to walk to Bombay from Ahmedabad. I have nothing to show that Respondents sent any instruct ions as to the method of publishing the handbills or that they themselves sont the packet of handbills to Bombay. But they passed a resolution agreeing to the printing and sending to Bombay of handbills.
૧૫૩
Mr. Dosai, and Mr. Taleyorkhan Mr. Velinkar address the Court.
ORDER.
Notice discharged. In my opinion the more passing of a resolution that handbills should be printed and sending to Bombay would not render Respondents responsible for the allogd excess of publication in Bombay. The wordings of the telegrams seem to me to be nioderate and I do not think the communication of the message teleghraphed to telegraphic operators will causo complainant damage within the meaning of the section. This view I think is supported by Complainant's own conduct for he has waited over a year before filling his complaint. Complainant candidly admits that he only canie to the Police Court after he found his opponents would not liston. It is clear in my opinion that this prosecution launched with ulterior motives. Complainant wishes to be re-admi tted into the Sang. I do not think it was the intention of the Legislature that the criminal law should be used 88 means of exerting prossure.
(sd.) A. II. 8. Ashton. Chief Presidency MAGISTRATE-BOMBAY,
For Private And Personal Use Only
