Arhat Vachan 2011 01 04

SR No.: 526589
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Anupam Jain
Publisher: Kundkund Gyanpith Indore
Publication Year: 2011
Total Pages: 140
Language: Hindi
Classification: Magazine, India_Arhat Vachan, & India
File Size: 2 MB

Page 87

Following possible resaons may be assigned to it.
i) Because it does not have any negative energy of oxygen radicals, (which might be same or equivalent to Mehta's bad energy ! This has to be investigated.)
ii) The total energy represents the good energy of a plain dead body only, because the boiled water does not have any live body energy (i.e. of live water) or pranik energy. That means,
i) Negative energy of radicals is max, for tap water and zero for boiled water.
From this "Datum Energy" of boiled water as per shah's lab., one has to subtract radical energy (negative) and add Live energy E (li) (+ve) in order to get actual value of energy of tap-water. ii) Live energy of dead water is nil, whereas it is maximum for XX sample. 4.5.4 Problems paused:
i) It needs to be proved that Mehta's bad energy refers to or is same as shah's energy of radicals. And Mehta's good energy is similar to Live and Pranik energy of Shah's lab. Here (Ep) represents superimposed discipline by pranik energy on live-energy (Eli)
ii) As such, this phenomenon of Boiled water of Dhovan acquiring max.good energy, needs further investigations and exact explanation.
4.5.5 Effects of Dynamisation Similarly, the energy of water, after dynamisation can be derived as follows: Ex=Edw,+E-E +E
(Here the discipline of is enhanced by dynamisation. It should have received and stored maximum pranik energy (EP) in it, in case of remedy of potency 10M. It would be less for a potency of 6X, Here, although total energy due ET increases due to super imposition of Pranik energy discipline Ed on live energy E , but due to reduction in randomness, the total aread of aura energy (E(A) would actually decrease. Thus it denotes higher energy density. 4.6 Mehta's Photographs : 4.6.1 Status of good and bad energy during dynamisation (Mehta's Lab)
If the good and bad energies do not cancel each other, they would exist together simultaneously, as revealed in Blue and Red colors in the Foto by Dr. Mehta. It is also observed that the graphs of good energy and the scattering of energies run almost paralle if they are positioned about a neutral axis (Foto 15). It means, if a sample has more good energy (Mehta), it would exhibit less energy-scattering (shsh), as if the sum total of these scalar quantities has to be almost constant, unless extra pranik energy is added by dynamisation. When Ep (pranik) is superimposed on normal water aura area EA, its scattering is reduced in proportion to the intensity of Ep. Thus the density of aura energy goes on increasing and the entropy goes on decreasing by dynamisation. Since the data of Mehta is not quantifiable, it is considered to be only an assesment of the 'Trend', Table 5 of previous article has now been modified as per this anlytical conslusion in new Table 5M, given here. TABLE 5M: Probable relative magnitude of aura of different constituents of water (Assessed):
Arhat Vacana, 23 (1-2), 2011