________________
Vol. XX, 1996
VARIANTS FROM VENISAMHÄRA AND...
87
edn. (p. 240), 7. 4. edn. p. II (p. 49), F. 7. & F. 5. edn. (p.60), fade edn. p. II (p. 212), fakil. edn. p. II (p. 42), i (7.) edn. (p. 72-73) and Harian (H) edn. p. II (p. 134). ante: - All editions of the Venī have this reading, but N. S. edn. (p. 86), Gaj. edn. (p. 80) and Des. edn. (p. 87-88) have also noted the other' reading. Et in the ft. note. The different commentaries on the K. P. have also accepted are: except yello edn (p. 370-371), which has SUUTETTL for UE: . & 3. edn. (p. 291) and a (7.) edn. (p. 72-73) have also mentioned TITET in the ft. note. Jha edn. (p. 328) has also noted it in his commentary
'केशग्रहात्' इति पाठे तातस्य द्रोणस्य केशग्रहाद्धेतोः क्षत्रात् क्षत्रियादेव धृष्टद्युम्नात् तथाविधः कार्तवीर्यार्जुनाज्जमदग्नेरिव परिभव इत्यर्थः ।
शस्त्रघस्मर - This variant is accepted by all editions of the Venī, but N. S. edn. (p. 86) has also noted the other reading- are in the ft. note. The different commentaries on the K. P. differ in giving this variant. Some of them have शस्त्रघस्मर. See - 77. & 3. edn. (p. 291), T. edn. (p. 370-371), H. 7. & F. 4. edn. (p. 60), falarci edn. p. II' (p. 212), fasil. edn. p. II (p. 42), al (FT.) edn. (p. 72-73) and
ha (F.) edn. p. II (p. 134). The first and the last but one - i.e. 4. & 3. edn. and ha (F.) edn. have also noted faceret? in the ft. note; while Jha. edn. (p. 328), R.P. edn. (p. 360), TTT edn. (p. 240) and F. t. edn. p. II (p. 49) have fare for a . #All editions of the Veni. have accepted this reading but N. S. edn. (p. 86) has also noted the other one - in the ft. note. The different commentaries on the K. P. have #, while he (h.) edn. (p. 134) has 7 with in the ft. note. ca -
This reading is also accepted by all editions of the Veni. and those of the K. P.
