Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## 72
**Explanation of the Six Substances and Five Astikayas (further explained)**
Just as when one looks at a very long bamboo stick, whose lower half is partially covered and partially uncovered with various colorful paintings, and whose upper half is completely covered and pure (unpainted), the vision, determining the pervasiveness of the colorfulness caused by the various paintings, concludes that "the bamboo is completely impure (i.e., entirely colorful)", similarly, when one applies intellect to a living being whose lower part, very large and filled with variegatedness (various vibhava-paryayas) caused by karma like jnana-avaran, is partially covered and partially uncovered, and whose upper part, very large and pure (siddh-paryaya), is completely covered, the intellect, determining the pervasiveness of the variegatedness caused by karma like jnana-avaran, concludes that "the being is completely impure".
Again, just as the cause of the apparent knowledge of pervasiveness in the bamboo is the continuity (flow) of the colorfulness caused by the various paintings in the lower uncovered part, similarly, the cause of the apparent knowledge of pervasiveness in the living being is the continuity of the variegatedness caused by karma like jnana-avaran in the lower uncovered part. And just as the bamboo is pure (in the upper part) because there is no continuity of the colorfulness caused by the various paintings, similarly, the living being is pure (in the upper part) because there is no continuity of the variegatedness caused by karma like jnana-avaran, which absence is known through the knowledge of the authoritative scriptures, correct inferential knowledge, and extra-sensory perception.
**Commentary on the Sanskrit Meaning of the Verse 20**
Although all beings are pure in their essence according to the dravya-arthic-naya (doctrine of substance), they are not pure in their paryaya (state) according to the paryaya-arthic-naya (doctrine of state). This is because the state of a siddha (liberated being) is not produced. Or, when a human being dies, the same being is reborn as a deva (god). Similarly, when the state of samsara (worldly existence) is destroyed due to the absence of mithyatva (falsehood), raga (attachment), etc., and the state of a siddha is attained, there is no destruction of the being. In both cases, it is the same being. Or, according to the dravya-arthic-paryaya-arthic-naya (doctrine of substance and state), which is relative to each other, the truth is explained as anekanta (multifaceted). Then, the liberation is explained as the shedding of the mithyatva, raga, etc., which are the bonds in the form of jnana-avaran, etc., in the state of samsara, and the attainment of the pure state. Keeping these three points in mind, the sutra (aphorism) is explained:
"The jnana-avaran, etc., are firmly bound to the being. The dravya-karma-paryayas (states of substance and karma) like jnana-acharana, etc., are firmly bound to the samsaric being in the form of a continuous chain from beginningless time."
"When the being attains the three jewels of a-bheda (non-duality), ratna (jewel), and a-jheda (non-destruction), which are obtained through time and effort, and the path of liberation through practical certainty, then the dravya-karma-paryayas (states of substance and karma) like jnana-avaran, etc., are destroyed, and the being becomes a siddha, which is unprecedented according to the paryaya-arthic-naya. According to the dravya-arthic-naya, the being was already a siddha."
**Explanation**
Just as a large bamboo stick has its lower half covered with various colorful paintings, making it impure, and its upper half pure because it is free from those paintings, similarly, when a person named Devadatta looks at it, he mistakenly believes...