Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
**Vāsvamisva**
In Kārmāṇa Kāyayoga, bondage should be understood as similar to Audārika Miśrayoga, but in the case of Tiryaṅvāyu and Manuṣyāyu, these two natures should be considered as having bondage of 112 natures less than the general. And in terms of Guṇasthānas, in Mithyātva Guṇasthāna, there is bondage of 177, in the second, 14, in the fourteenth, 75, and in the thirteenth, 1 Sātavēdaniya.
In Āhārak Kāyayoga, bondage should be understood as similar to Guṇasthāna. That is, just as there are 13 natures in the sixth Guṇasthāna, so it should be understood in this yoga. In another opinion, bondage of 63.47 natures has also been said. Some Ācāryas have considered bondage of 62 natures in Āhārakamith Kāyayoga.
Thus, after explaining the bondage in Audārika, Kārmāṇa, and Āhārak Kāyayoga, in the next verse, we explain the bondage in Vaikriya Kāyayoga, Veda, and Kṣaya Mārgāṇa, in the infinite-bound, non-rejectable, and rejectable Kṣaya distinctions.
**Verse 16:**
**Gāthārtha:** In Vaikriya Kāyayoga, bondage should be understood as similar to Devamati, and in Vaikriyamiṭra Kāyayoga, bondage of other natures except Tiryaṅvāyu and Manuṣyāyu should be understood as similar to Vaikriya Kāyayoga, and in Veda and Kṣaya Mārgāṇa, bondage should be understood as follows: in Veda Mārgāṇa, nine from the beginning, in infinite-bound Kṣaya, two from the beginning, in the second, non-rejectable Kṣaya, twelve from the beginning, and in the third, rejectable Kṣaya, five from the beginning, like the Guṇasthānas.
**Viśeṣa:** In the above, the bondage in Vaikriya Kāyayoga and Vaikriyamiṭra Kāyayoga, or in Veda and Kṣaya Mārgāṇa, in the infinite-bound, non-rejectable, and rejectable Kṣaya, has been explained.