Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Third Karma Text
**1**
They remain, and in them, the combination of the five Jina, the Tīrthaṅkara, the Nāmakarma, the Devadvik, and the Vaikriya results in the bondage of 75 Prakṛtis in the fourth Guṇasthāna.
**Doubt:** In the fourth Guṇasthāna, the Audārika-miśra Kāyayoga is said to have ownership of the bondage of 75 Prakṛtis. Among them are the five Prakṛtis: Manuşyadvik, Ārfrefae, and Vajraṛṣabha-nārāca-sahana. On this, Śrī Jīvavijaī has raised a doubt in his commentary, stating that the Audārika-miśra Kāyayogi in the fourth Guṇasthāna cannot bind these five Prakṛtis. Because this yoga is not possible with anyone other than Tīrthaṅkara and Manuşya, and Niyantrā and Manuşya cannot bind these five Prakṛtis in this Guṇasthāna. Therefore, the 70 and 71 Prakṛtis mentioned in the Tīrthaṅkara-gati and Manuşya-gati in the fourth Guṇasthāna do not include these five Prakṛtis.
**Solution:** Śrī Jayasoṃasūri has resolved this doubt in his commentary, stating that the word "asa" in the verse should not be interpreted as "the 24 Prakṛtis starting with Anantānubandhī," but rather, the word "āha" should include five more Prakṛtis, making a total of 26 Prakṛtis, including the 24 starting with Anantānubandhī and the five starting with Manuşyadvik. This interpretation removes the doubt. Because subtracting 20 from 94 leaves 65 Prakṛtis, and adding the five Jina to them results in 70 Prakṛtis. The ownership of their bondage in that yoga at the time of that Guṇasthāna is not contradictory in any way. This solution seems authentic.
**Another point:** There is no word in the original verse that indicates the number 75. Śrī Nemicandra Siddhāntacakravartī also accepts the separation of 20 Prakṛtis in the second Guṇasthāna.
**Paṇṇarasasunu tī**
**Mirge avira chīvī cauro.**
**Go. Karmakāṇḍa, Māyā 116**