Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## First Difference
**Regarding the origin of Avadhijnana and Manahparyayajnana, the Digambar literature mentions aspects that are not found in the Svetambar literature.**
**Concerning the origin of Avadhijnana, the Digambar literature states that it originates from those regions of the soul that are present in the auspicious limbs marked by conch shells, etc.**
**The origin of Manahparyayajnana is from those regions of the soul that are connected to Dravyaman, and the location of Dravyaman is the heart. In other words, the cessation of Manahparyayajnana occurs in the regions of the soul located in the heart.**
**The concept of Dravyaman, as described in the Digambar literature, is not found in the Svetambar literature. The Digambar literature states that Dravyaman resides in the heart. Its shape is like an eight-petaled lotus. It is formed from the skandhas of Manovagana. Its formation involves the emergence of Antaranga Karma and Angopanganam Karma.**
**Regarding the three types of Mithyatvamohaniya (false belief and delusion), the Svetambar literature uses the analogy of rice grains to explain the three types: Samyaktva (right belief), Mithyatva (false belief), and Misra (mixed belief).**
**They consider pure rice grains, washed and free from husk, as Samyaktva, rice grains with husk and unwashed as Mithyatva, and partially washed and partially unwashed rice grains as Misra.**
**However, the Digambar literature uses the analogy of ground rice grains. They consider rice grains with husk as Mithyatva, those completely free from husk as Samyaktva, and the particles (grains) as Misra (mixed belief).**
**The primary cessation (of Mithyatvamohaniya) is...**
**1. Gommatasar, Jivakand, verse 442**
**2. Gommatasar, Jivakand, verse 441**