Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
750/Go. Sa. Jivakan
Gava 728.726
There are 16, 38 and 50 Bhedasthanas respectively. This specific explanation is not being given because it has already been stated in detail in this text. Now, the twenty Bhedas mentioned by the 'Gunajiya Pajjattipana...' are planned by this gatha.
Veeramuhkamalarinaggayasayalasuyaggahanpayouranasammattham.
Gamiouran Goyamamaham, Siddhatalavamanuboccham. ||728||
Gathaarth - I bow to Gautam Ganadhar, who is capable of receiving and revealing all the scriptures that came out of the lotus mouth of Mahavira Swami. Now I will speak about the Siddhanta. ||728||
So what
The name of the special text is Gommatasar. Therefore, the statement of 20 Prarupanas has been made in a summary form. The same is the case with Siddhanta Alap. The main issues related to the Siddhanta have been stated by Acharya Shri in the previous 6-7 gathas. Siddhanta Alap means some statements related to the Siddhanta. This is all that Acharya Shri wanted from 'Siddhanta Alap'. One should understand the detailed explanation from the second book of the Dhavala Tika of the Pat Khandagam (from page 418 to the last page). Due to the fear of excessive length of the text, that Prarupana is not being done here.
The rule to be considered in the statement of Siddhanta Alap is Manapjjavpariharao Patamuvasammat Do piran Pahara.
Edesu Ekkapgave Gasthitti Asesayam Jane. ||726||
Gathaarth - One should know that if there is one of these four - Manahparyaygyan, Parihar Vishuddhisayam, Prathamopasham Samyaktav and Graharakdway (Aharak and Aharakmith), then the other three Bhedas do not exist. ||726||
Vishesharth - If there is one of the above 4 Marganamas (in any being), then there are not 3 Marganas (in that being). For example, if a being has Manahparyaygyan, then it will not have Parihar Vishuddhisanyam, Prathamopasham Samyaktav and 'Graharaksharir and Aharak Angopang'. One should know this. ||726||
Shankha - Then, in this way, it is not possible for the Yahaarakkayayogi and Praharakmith Kayayogi Muni Raj to have Upasham Samyaktav?
Samadhan - No, such Muni Rajdhi can only have Bhayyik and Kshayopaamik - these two Samyaktavs.
1. Go. Ji. 77-785 3-Me762. Go. Ji. 3||vam Go. Ji. 726 and Dh. 2/12|| Pra. Pan. Gan. 1/2. 3. Written according to the statement of Siddhanacharya Panditkalagavatmahodayana. 4. Pra. Pan. San. 1/1/1641.41 and San. Pan. San. 1/340 and Gh. 1/824 Ga. 240. But there, in the first half, in 'Mranapjjav Parihage', the text is 'Uvasamasammas Doshiya Yaahara'. Even that is the correct reading of the text 'Padambammammatt'. [Tikaakar]