Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Verse 142
## Margna/161
**Solution:** It is not correct to say that, because the seventh case ending in this verse is a marker of location, it also implies the third case.
**Question:** Why is only Margna taught in this verse, excluding Mrgyita, Mrgya, and Margnoupaya?
**Solution:** This is not a valid objection. Because the word "Nimami" is a marker of location. Or, the word "Margma" is inseparable from the other three, so by mentioning only Margna, the other three are also implied.
**Gati:** That which is attained is Gati. By defining Gati in this way, it does not fall into the fallacy of over-application with Siddhas, because Siddhas lack the qualities that can be attained. If we were to say that only knowledge and other qualities are attainable, that would not be a valid statement, because the concept of attainment and attainment-maker is contradictory in the nature of pure consciousness. Due to being generated by adhyasa, only passions and other emotions can be considered attainable, but these are not found in Siddhas, so there is no fallacy of over-application with Siddhas.
**Indriya:** Those that function in direct perception are called Indriyas. The eye is called Indriya, and that which exists in relation to the eye is called direct perception, which is the object of the Indriyas or the knowledge generated by the Indriyas. Those that function in direct perception, which is the object of the Indriyas or the knowledge generated by the Indriyas, are called Indriyas. These Indriyas are generated by the destruction and pacification of the knowledge-obscuring karma called touch, taste, form, smell, and sound, and by the material Indriyas. The material Indriyas are generated only when the subtle Indriyas, which are in the form of destruction and pacification, exist. Therefore, the subtle Indriyas are the cause and the material Indriyas are the effect. This is why the material Indriyas are also called Indriyas. Or, the subtle Indriyas are generated by the material Indriyas, so the subtle Indriyas are the effect and the material Indriyas are the cause. This is also why the material Indriyas are called Indriyas. This is not an unfounded assumption, because the effect-based dharma in the cause and the cause-based dharma in the effect are found in the world in a well-known way.
**Kaya:** That which is accumulated is Kaya. If we create a definition that "that which is accumulated is Kaya," then this definition would also apply to the opposite, such as the accumulation of bricks, etc., excluding Kaya. Therefore, it would fall into the fallacy of contradiction. Realizing this doubt, the Acharya says that this fallacy of contradiction does not arise with the accumulation of bricks, etc., because it is explained that "that which is accumulated by the karma-arising from the stationary name like "earth," etc., and the karma-arising from the non-stationary name is Kaya."
**References:**
1. Pra.Pu. 1, p. 133
2. Dha.Pu. 1, p. 134
3. "Gamyata iti Gati" (Mulaachar Paryapti Adhikar, p. 2766, verse 156, commentary; A.Pu. 1, p. 134)
4. Dha.Pu. 1, p. 134
5. "Pratyakshanirataani Indriyani. Prakshagindriyani." (Cha.Pu. 1, p. 135)
6. Pa.Pu. 1, p. 135
7. "Chiyata iti Kayah" (Dha.Pu. 1, p. 138)
8. Pa.Pu. 1, p. 138