Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## 338
The *Adipurana* states that the *samsari* (worldly being) is bound by dependence on others. This teaching, when applied to the liberated being, demonstrates their independence. ||8||
The *samsari* is an example of dependence, and this example reveals the independence of the liberated soul. ||81||
For example, the embodied being in the cycle of birth and death is never independent. Bound by karma, they live dependent on others. ||82||
This demonstrates the dependence of the *samsari*. Similarly, due to the experience of pain and suffering, this being is also fickle. ||83||
The agitation caused by pain and suffering is called fickleness. The loss of powers gained in the realm of gods, etc., indicates the perishable nature of this being. ||84||
The suffering inflicted upon this being, as well as the reception of unpleasant words, are signs of their bondage. Their knowledge, born of the senses, is perishable, and therefore finite. ||85||
Their perception is also finite, as it arises from the senses. Their vitality is also of the same nature, meaning finite, because their physical strength is very limited. ||86||
Their happiness, born of the senses, is also of this nature. The stain they bear due to the influence of karmic particles is their impurity. ||87||
They are also impure due to the connection with karmic impurities. Their bodies can be cut into pieces, indicating their vulnerability. ||88||
Their bodies can be shattered by a blow from a hammer, etc., indicating their fragility. The decline of their state is their old age, and the abandonment of their life force is their death. ||89||
They are limited, as they are confined to their finite body. Their existence in the womb, their infancy, and their difficult stay in the mother's womb are all examples of this. ||90||
Now, to solidify the above statement, an example of a *samsari* being should be given. ||79||
The statement about the dependence of *samsari* beings, when applied to the teaching of liberation, becomes an example of the independence of liberated beings. The meaning is that the description of the dependence of *samsari* beings inherently describes the independence of liberated beings, because the absence of dependence in *samsari* beings is the very definition of the independence of liberated beings. ||80||
In the opinion of the *Arhat* and the *Deva*, the example of a *samsari* is one that reveals the independence of liberated beings. ||81||
This example is further clarified: In the cycle of birth and death, this being is not independent in any way. Bound by karma, they live dependent on others. ||82||
This explains the dependence of the *samsari*. Similarly, due to the experience of pain and suffering, this being is also fickle. ||83||
The agitation caused by pain and suffering is called fickleness. The loss of powers gained in the realm of gods, etc., indicates the perishable nature of this being. ||84||
The suffering inflicted upon this being, as well as the reception of unpleasant words, are signs of their bondage. Their knowledge, born of the senses, is perishable, and therefore finite. ||85||
Their perception is also finite, as it arises from the senses. Their vitality is also of the same nature, meaning finite, because their physical strength is very limited. ||86||
Their happiness, born of the senses, is also of this nature. The stain they bear due to the influence of karmic particles is their impurity. ||87||
They are also impure due to the connection with karmic impurities. Their bodies can be cut into pieces, indicating their vulnerability