________________
MARCH, 1884.]
A NEW GURJARA COPPER-PLATE GRANT.
77
after the examination of many dates bothera or the era of the Kala churis of Tripura, before and after the approximate period of which he had already fixed" as commencing in A.D. 245,-that the only epoch that agrees for A.D. 249 = 0, with A.D. 250 = the year 1." both the eclipse and the week-day, is the In accordance with Pandit Bhagwânlal year A.D. 249-50, with A.D. 250-51 as the Indraji's suggestion that the Ilô grant may year 1 of the era.
contain a genuine date in the era used in the Adding 456 to 249-50, we obtain A.D. 705-6. Nausâri and Kivi grants, falsely referred to And, as Magha corresponds with January- the Saka era,-General Cunningham has calcu. February, the date of this grant must be in lated the details of this date also, vis. the occur. the early part of A.D. 706. In that year, the rence of an eclipse of the sun on the new-moon full-moon of Mågha fell on Tuesday, the 2nd day of the month Jyaishtha, or usually MayFebruary, on which day there was an eclipse June, in the year 417. Adding 249-50, we of the moon.
obtain A.D. 666-67; and the month of JyaishApplying the same epoch to the date of the
tha belonged to A.D. 666. In that year, howKävi grant, General Cunningham obtains Sun- ever, there was no solar eclipse till the 25th day, the 24th Jane A.D. 736, as corresponding August, which is after the recorded date and with the Sunday, the tenth day of the bright will not suit in any way. But, in the preceding fortnight of the month AshAdha, or June-July, year, the new-moon of Jyaishtha fell on the 21st in the year 486, as recorded in that grant. April A.D. 665, on which day there was an
With these two coincidences, we are plainly eclipse of the sun, as required; to apply it to on firm ground. And the era thus obtained is, the date of the grant, however, assumes an error as General Cunningham points out, the Chôdi l of one year in the recorded date.
Test."
First plate. ' Svasti Sri-Kâyávatâra-vasakît satata-Lakshmi-nivasa-bhûte igas trishna-santâ pa-hariņi din
[&• ]nÅtha-vi[') stârit-inubhîvå 18 dvija-kul-ôpaji vyamâna-vibhava-sålini 18 mahati mahâraja-Karnn.
Anvayê 1$ kamal-Åkara iva rå[°1 jahamsaḥ prabala-Kalikala-vilasit-akulita"-vimala-svabhÂvô gambhir-ôdåra-charita-visma.
pita-sa kala-lôkapa[') la-mânasaḥ paramèśvara-Śri-Harshadêr-Abhibhůta-Valabhîpati-pati(ri)trân-Ôpajâ ta-bhra
mad-adabhra-subhr-Abhra-vibhrama'l yaśô-vitâ nah Sri-Daddas=Tasya sânar=aśankit-agata-pranayi-jan-Ôpabhukta-vibhava-san
chay-pachiyamana-mano. [°] nirvșitik(r)=anêka-kantaka-vansa-sadha-durllalita-pratáp-Analo nisita-nistrinsa-dhára-da
rit-êráti-kari] kumbha-muktậphala-chchhal-Ollasita-sita-yaś8-náuk-åvagunthita-digvadhû-vadana-sarasijah
Sri-Jayabhatas=Tasy=ktmajó ma[ ] hâmuni-Mana-pranita-pravachan-Adhigama-vivêka-svadharmm-ânushthâna-pravaņi" varnn
Aśrama-vyavasth-Ônmülita-saka['] la-Kalikål-Avalêpah praņayi-jana-manôratha-vilaya-vyatita-vibhava-sampâdan-âpanit-abesha
pârtthiva-dan-&["] bhimânô mada-vivas-ankuéâtivartti-kupita kari-nivårana-prathita-gara-gaj-adhirðhaņa-pra-.
bhÂvő vipat-pra påta. ["] patita-narapati-sat-abhyuddharaṇa-nikhila-loka-viéruta-par-pakara-karaṇa-vyasanaḥ prach
ya-pratichy-adhiraja
» Archeological Survey of India, Vol. IX. p. 111.
* This epoch was first pointed out by Dr. Fits. Edward Hall, in Jour. Amer. Orient. Soc. Vol. VI. p. 501; see ante, Vol. IX. p. 256.-EDI. 4.
* From the original plates.
* This mark of punotuation is unnecessary, also all those that follow, down to line 22.
* The sense requires us to correct this into vilasitandkulita.
* Correct into prarand or praots.