Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The happiness that arises from the action or accomplishment of consuming food, etc., is called theoretical happiness. The suffering that arises from the accomplishment or action of being beaten with a whip, being branded with hot iron, etc., is called theoretical suffering. The inner joy-like happiness that arises suddenly, whose external causes are not visible, is called non-theoretical happiness. Similarly, the suffering that arises from one's own limbs in the form of fever, headache, abdominal pain, etc., is called non-theoretical suffering. Both types of happiness and suffering do not arise from man's own efforts. Nor are they produced by time or anything else. Both types of happiness and suffering are experienced by beings separately. The question arises - why do these happiness and suffering occur to beings? To make this known, the determinist explains his opinion through the word *sangaiansanghatikam*.
*Samyak* - the movement that comes from its result is called *sangati*. This means that the situation from which the suffering of the being who is to experience happiness and suffering arises is called *sanghatik*. It is destiny. The happiness and suffering that arise from that destiny are *sanghatik*.
Thus, according to what has been said earlier, the happiness and suffering of beings are not done by their own efforts or endeavors, but are done by their destiny, therefore they are called *sanghatik*. Here, the discussion of the subject of happiness and suffering experience, which has been done by some principle theorists, is their accepted principle. It has been said - whatever material object is to be obtained, good or bad, good or bad, it will surely be obtained by man by the force of destiny. What is not to be obtained, what is not to be obtained, is not obtained by beings even after great effort. What is to be, will never perish.
*Ev meyani jampanta, bala pandiamanino. Niyayanaiyam santam, ayanamta abuddhiya. ||4||*
*Chhaya* - *Evametaani jalpanto balaha panditamaninah. Niyatanaiyatam santam majananto'buddhikaha. ||*
*Anuvaad* - Those who have been discussed earlier are the determinists, they are ignorant, but they consider themselves wise and knowledgeable, they say. In reality, happiness and suffering are fixed from one perspective and uncertain from another perspective, i.e., they are *niyatanaiyat*, but the determinists do not accept this without knowing it.
*Teeka* - *Evam shloka dvayena niyativadimatam upanyasyasyothar danaayaha. Evamityananta roktasya uprapradarshane. Etaani puroktaani niyativadaashritani vachanani jalpanto abhidhadhato balaa iva balaa agnaha sadasadivveka vikala api santah panditamanina atmanam panditam mantum shelam yesham te tatha kimiti ta eva muchyantan? Iti tadaha - ) Yato 'niyayanaiyam santamiti' sukhaadikam kinchit niyatikritam avashyambhavya udayaprapitam tatha aniyatam atmapurushakarashavaradiprapitam sat niyatikritameva ekante nasrayanti, ato'janaanaha sukhadhukhaadikaranamabuddhikaha buddhirahita* (61)