Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
They say that all is accomplished by action. With the idea that "all is accomplished by action," they declare that all exists, having known the "world" as consisting of the stationary and the mobile, and assuming that we are knowers of the existing things as they are. How do they say that it is not in any way non-existent? "Thus, thus," in that way, as action is, so is the fruit, such as heaven, hell, etc. And those ascetics, Tirthankaras, Brahmanas, etc., desire accomplishment by action. But whatever suffering and happiness there is in the world, all that is done by the self alone, not by another, such as time, Lord, etc. And this does not hold true in the theory of inaction, for there, due to inaction of the self, happiness and suffering would be uncreated, and thus there would be no coming and going of the created and the destroyed. Here it is said, "It is true that there is happiness, suffering, etc., of the self, but it is not so." For if it is said that it is so, then it follows that it is not in any way non-existent. And if that is the case, then everything would become all-pervading, and thus there would be an end to the conduct of all the world. And there is no accomplishment of action without knowledge, due to the absence of knowledge of the means. And without the means, the object is not attained. It is understood that all actions are fruitful only when they are done with knowledge. And it is said:
"First is knowledge, then compassion, thus stands the well-controlled. What will the ignorant do, or know, the cutting of evil?"
Therefore, the importance of knowledge is not denied. And accomplishment is not possible without knowledge, for knowledge without action is like a cripple, unable to accomplish anything. Considering this, it is said, "They said, 'Knowledge and conduct are the liberation.'" There is no accomplishment of action without knowledge, like a blind man, nor is there accomplishment of knowledge without action, like a cripple. Understanding this, they said, "They said, the Tirthankara-group, the Dharas, etc., what did they say? Liberation. How? Knowledge and conduct, these two are the causes, for whom? Having understood this, they said, 'This knowledge and conduct is liberation, accomplished by knowledge and action.' They declare this liberation, thus accomplished. If it is otherwise, then what are these Samvaranas declared by the Patanikas? And what is said, and what will be said, with this doubt, it is said, "They are thus, with unhindered..." Those who have unhindered, never-faltering, knowledge, the Tirthankaras, they are of unhindered knowledge. They thus, by the process described, declare, "The world," consisting of fourteen realms, or the stationary and the mobile, "having known," by the knowledge of the self, like the dust on the palm of the hand, the Tathagatas, "not having attained the Tirthankarahood, the perfect knowledge," the ascetics, "the virtuous, the Brahmanas," the restrained and the unrestrained, what is the nature of the Koka-speech, the words? They thus declare. Or, there is a reading, "Thus, thus," as the path of meditation is established, so they declare. And they also declare, "As whatever suffering there is in the world, which is not of the nature of arising, that which is opposite to it, happiness, which is of the nature of arising, that is done by the self alone, not by another, such as time, Lord, etc." And it is said:
"All experience the fruit, the result, of their past actions. In faults and virtues, the other is only the cause."
And they, the Tirthankara-group, the Dharas, etc., say, "Knowledge, conduct, action, these are the main things, liberation. They said, not independent of each other, knowledge and action." And it is said:
"Action without knowledge is fruitless, knowledge without action is wealth without understanding. Rejecting the mass of afflictions for the sake of peace, you have written down this path, which is auspicious."
The author of the sutras reveals the fault of the theory of the actionists, in order to refute them. (Those who accept that liberation is attained only by action, such as renunciation, etc., without knowledge. Their declaration is that there are parents, and there is also the fruit of good action, which is well performed. What do they want to say by this? Raising this question, the author of the sutras states. All actions are accomplished by action.