Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Swasama Vaktavyataadhikarah ki drishti se de. Isa kathana dvara yahan solaha prakaara ke utpada dosha parigrahita hain, yaha samajhana chahiye. Ataeva vaha bhikshu dautya-duta kaarya, grihasthoṃ ka sandesa pahunchaana, dhaatri-dhaaya ka kaarya, grihasta ke baccoṃ ko laada pyaara karana aadi tathaa naimittika aadi doshoṃ se varjita aahaara grihana karane ki icchaa kare. Isa kathana se dasa prakaara ke eshanaa doshoṃ parigrahita hote hain. Yaha maanana chahiye, jaanana chahiye. Saadhau aahaara mein amurchhita-anaasakta rahe. Raaga dvesa se vipramukta-vivarjita rahe, isa kathana se paancha prakaara ke graaishana doshoṃ ka nirasana ya parivartana ho jaataa hai. Isa prakaara vartana karataa huaa, rahataa huaa muni dusaroṃ ka apamana na kare. Apani tapasyaa aura jnaana ka ahankara na karein.
Lokavaayaṃ nisamijjaa, ihamekesi maahiyaṃ. Vipariyapannasaṃbhuyaṃ, annautaṃ tayaanuyaṃ ||5|| Chhāyā - Lokavādaṃ niśāmayed ihaike̍ṣām ākhyātam | Viparītaprajñāsambhūtam anyokta̍ṃ tadanugam ||
Translation:
From the perspective of the authority of the topic under discussion, it should be understood that here sixteen types of production defects are included. Therefore, that monk should desire to accept food free from the defects of messenger work, conveying messages of householders, the work of wet-nurses, fondling the children of householders, and so on, as well as occasional and other defects. This statement includes ten types of craving defects. This should be believed, this should be known. The ascetic should remain unattached and unaffected in accepting food. He should remain free and detached from attachment and aversion. This statement eliminates or avoids five types of object-craving defects. Conducting and living in this manner, the monk should not disrespect others. He should not have the ego of his austerity and knowledge.
Many say that one should listen to the statements of the Lokavādins (those who believe in traditional/popular doctrines), but the reality is that the view of those Lokavādins or traditionalists is born from perverted intellect. It is false, untrue, just like the views of other sectarians.