Gandharwad

SR No.: 011044
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Ratnaprabhvijay, D P Thaker
Publisher: Jain Granth Prakashak Sabha
Publication Year: 1942
Total Pages: 579
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 63 MB

Page 293

.: 250 :.
Jinabhadra Gani's
[The fourth
rear portion is not perceptible and since front portion is very minute, everything is s'unya,† the author indicates
देस साराभागो घेप्पड़ न य सो ति नणु विरुद्धमिणं । सवाभावे विन सो घेप्पड़ किं खरविसाणस्स ॥१९१॥ (१७३९)
Desassarabhago gheppai na ya so tti nanu viruddhamīnam Savvābhāve vi na so gheppar kim kharavisānassa 191 (1739) [ देशस्थाराद्भागो गृह्यते न च स इति ननु विरुद्धमिदम् ।
सर्वाभावेऽपि न स गृह्यते किं खरविषाणस्य १ । १९१ ।। ( १७३९ ) Deśasyarādbhago grihyate na ca sa iti nanu viruddhamidam Sarvābhāve’pi na sa grihyate kim kharavisanasya ? ॥1910 (1739) ]
Trans.-191 To say that the foremost portion of a visible object is perceptible but it does not exist, is really contradictory. (For) even in the midst of all-pervading negation, why is the front part of the horn of an ass not perceived ? ( 1739 )
99
टीका - यदुक्तम् - " दृश्यस्यापि वस्तुनः परभागस्तावद् न दृश्यते, आराद्भागस्तु गृह्यते, परं सोऽप्यन्यान्यपरभागकल्पनया प्रागुक्तयुक्तितो नास्ति इति । ननु विरुद्धमिदम् - " गृह्यतेऽसौ न च समस्ति " इति । सर्वाभावाद् भ्रान्त्याऽसौ गृह्यत इति चेत् । तदयुक्तम्, यतः सर्वाभावे तुल्येऽपि किमिति खरविषाणस्य संबन्धी आराद्भागो न गृह्यते १ । समता विपर्ययो वा कथं न भवति । इति ॥ १९९ ॥ ( १७३९ ) ।।
9
D. C.-It has been said before that only a front part of a visible object is perceived and not the rear part. This front part is, in comparision with other parts in the rear, very suksma and hence that too becomes non-existent This statement is self-contradicting. For, to say that it is perceptible but it does not exist, is absurd.
Here, if it is said, that in the midst of sarvabhava it is
+ Vide verse 1696.