________________
Vada ] Gañadharavada
• 201 : been produced so far-should also be taken as capable of being produced. Because, ajătatva is present in kharavişana also. But this is absurd. So, utpatti of an ajātu object is never possible.
(3) In the case of an object which is both jäta and arjata, the utpatti is not possible. Because dosas that are found in each one of the above two cases separately are certainly found in the combination of the two also.
Moreover, if an object which is ubhayarūpa is taken to be vidyamāna it becomes jäta and loses its jätājāta ubhayarūpa. Similarly, if it is a-vidyamāna, it cannot be called ubhayarūpa, but anutpanna only. Now, when it is utpanna or anutpanna, dosas like anavastha and abhāva do arise.
( 4 ) In the case of a jūyamāna object also, the above argument may be applied and the dosas like anavastha and abhāva arise in that case also, according as it becomes jāta or a-jāta due to its being vidyamāna or c-vidyamāna. So, utpatti in this case is also impossible.
So, it is said, " Gatam na gamyate távadagatam naiva gamyate ! Gatāgatavinirmuktam gamyamānain na ganyate 11"
Thus, in all the above-mentioned four avasthās of an object, it has been clearly pointed out that its utpatti is impossible. Hence, it is proper to believe in the Universal non-entity. 25- TATAPOT ofte Hag at a gi etori I . CIAS ALATTHİ ATHIN a FIAT 88011 (1884) Heū-paccayasāmaggi vîsu bhāvesu no va jam kajjam | Disai sāmaggimayam savvābhāve na sāmaggî u 147 11 ( 1695 )
[ हेतु-प्रत्ययसामग्री विष्वग् भावेषु नो वा यत् कार्यम् ।
sud naitai hatarët e rrut I1 880 II (8884) 26