Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**176.**
Somasen Bhattaraka has written and confirmed that Galava Rishi, having a wife of the same caste, prohibits a second marriage in Kaliyuga. However, those who interpret this verse as allowing remarriage of women are completely wrong. Because this interpretation goes against the Brahman tradition itself.
**177.**
If the groom has gone to another country after the engagement, one should wait for three years for his arrival. If he does not come within three years, the girl should be given to another groom. In the original manuscript, below this verse, it is written "iti parmatasmrti vachanam".
**178.**
After the marriage, the groom should go to his house with his wife. If the house is in another village, he should go by some conveyance.
**179.**
The time for the bride to enter the house is from the day of the marriage to the sixteenth day. During these sixteen days, she should enter the house on even dates, not on odd dates. The fifth day is auspicious on odd dates. Therefore, the fifth day is also considered good for entering the house. Do not enter the house on any other odd day.
**180.**
If the bride cannot enter the groom's house within the first sixteen days due to some reason, then she should enter on the fifth year, or the seventh year, or the ninth year, on an auspicious day according to the astrologers, when the moon is in the constellation of Shani. The next verse indicates that the first year is also considered good for the first entry. In some places, the third year is also considered.
**181.**
The bride's entry into the house is auspicious on the 4th, 8th, and 12th days of the marriage. In the month, it is auspicious on the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th days. In the year, the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th days are inauspicious. The 5th, 7th, and 9th days are considered auspicious by others. The bride's entry into the house should be complete with auspicious intentions and wealth.
**Note:** The phrase "panchaastamukhhya pare" in the verse seems incorrect. Perhaps it should be "panchaadimuhkhya pare", which would make the verse consistent with verse 180. Repetition is not considered in the collection of verses.