Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Swami Samantabhadra.
There has been no other famous scholar. Therefore, the said doubt seems to be unfounded. Yes, it can be said that Samantabhadra must have composed this book before his monastic life. But there is no support for this from the literature of the book. The Acharya, in this book, has displayed his culmination and the emotional form, from which your work seems to be of the monastic state. Such profound and highly emotional original compositions cannot be made while living in the household and doing royal work. To decide on this matter, while reading the entire book with attention, verses no. 19, 79 and 114 * should be brought to mind especially. From the 19th verse itself, it becomes known that Swami had become a refuge of the Vitrag Bhagwan, taking the body (leaving all other possessions) when he was afraid of the world, and your conduct at that time (at the time of writing the book) was pure, excellent, and as excellent or flawless as the conduct of the Ganadharas etc. That verse is as follows:
Puta-svanavamacharam tanvayatam bhayadrucha.
Swaya Vamesha paya ma natamekaachyasambhav || In this verse, Samantabhadra has given two special adjectives of his own (the words 'ma' and 'mam') in the form of 'Puta-svanavamachar' + and 'bhayat 4 tanvayatam'
* This verse is quoted further under the heading 'Future Tirthankar'. + 'Putah pavitrah su sustu anavamah ganadharadyanusthitah aacharah papakriyanivrittir yasya sau putah svanavamacharah -iti tika.
x Bhavat sansarbhiteh. Tanva shareeren (sah) ayatam agatam.