________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.org
Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir
(4) Fo. 50: 1 880 of G, K is corrected by O as 771910, (5) Fo. 67: G and K
K has placed small vertical strokes near the head-lines ul truth the ''s in order to seppurate these words from each other by putting a danla alter each as is done by it ut many other places. O realls against this: z. Are we to understand that the vertical strokes of K are mistaken by the scribe of as anusaviras wliile Jirectly copying down the text of K in his Ms. O ?
Some instances of G and O coinciding against the readings of Kare mentioned below: (1) Fn, 122: Gand read
which is corrected in K to #ma. ( 2 ) Fn. 170: G have that against 92623 of K, It
appears that thinkirg that afar is the correct word much more in usage than 4 . the scribe ells K revised the reading of G to
faal, but , wijle copying from K, Sanskritised the term for in its reading 24 which accidentally crincides with that
of G. (3) Fr. 60°: K *° for grid of G, O, (4) Fos. 18", 113*: 919*** and tignare ecribal errors of K against
the correct readings 27194i and arcu of G and 0. (5) Fn. 1.fo": K reads sirgtfa for ittha fe of G, O.
Now we may turn to the similarities of K and against G a few instances whereof are given below:
(0) Fn. 2::: K, O drop the word gui. (1) Fo, 28: K, O have ret for ata qe of G. (2) Fn. 37: The first of the names of the fernale friends is strony
against G wifes. (3) Page 3: K, O regularly numb:r the first nine of the female
friends, while G does not give numbers with the names (vida
fn. 33/. (4) Fn. 35: K. O omit tlie name of and add farsi. (5) Fr. 37: The order of the names an and is changed
in K, O.
For Private And Personal Use Only
