________________
५२
व्याप्तिपञ्चकम्
भाववति हेतोर्वृत्तेरव्याप्तिर्दुर्वारा इति । प्रतियोग्यवृत्तित्वमपहाय साध्यवत्त्वाच्छिन्नप्रतियोगिताकान्योन्याभावविवक्षणे तु पञ्चमेन सह पौनरुक्त्यमिति चेत्, न, वक्ष्यमाणकेवलान्वय्यव्याप्तिवदस्य अपि अत्र दोषत्वात् ।
(३७) न च तथापि साध्यवत्प्रतियोगिकान्योन्याभावमात्रस्यैव एतल्लक्षणघटकत्वे वक्ष्यमाणकेवलान्वय्यव्याप्तिः अत्रासङ्गता, केवलान्वयिसाध्यकेऽपि साध्याधिकरणीभूततत्तद्व्यक्तित्वावच्छिन्नप्रतियोगिता
determined by the state of being particular individual which is a substratum of that which is to be established, there the reason exists. If to avoid that fault instead of non-existence in the counter-positive, the mutual absence which has the counterpositive-ness determined by the state of having that which is to be established is used, there will be repeatation in the respect of fifth definition. This is not correct, because like too narrow application in the pure positive inference which will be said later on, here this fault also happens.
(37) Nor yet it can be argued that-if the mutual absence which has that a which has that which is to be established, this is only a part of the definition, the fault of too narrow application in the pure positive inference which is to be shown later on would be in-consistent in this case, because the mutual absence which has the counter-positive-ness determined by the state of being particular individual substratum of that which is to be established, is established, in the inference where that which is to be established is pure affirmative. This is because
