________________
प्रथमं लक्षणम्
३५
(२५) वृत्तित्वञ्च न हेतुतावच्छेदसम्बन्धेन विवक्षणीयम् । अस्ति च सत्तावान् द्रव्यत्वादित्यादौ सत्ताभावाधिकरणताश्रयवृत्तित्वस्य हेतुतावच्छेदकसमवायसम्बन्धावच्छिन्नाधेयतानिरूपितविशेषणताविशेषसम्बन्धेन सामान्याभावो द्रव्यत्वादौ, समवायसम्बन्धावच्छिन्नाधेयतानिरूपित
(25) The occupancy should not be desired to be mentioned by the relation which determines the state of being the reason. And there is general absence of occupancy and indi cated by that which has the substratum-ness of the absence of existence by the relation which is a kind of selfsome-ness relation described by the occupancy determined by inherence relation which determines the state of being the reason, in substance-ness. This is because the absence of existence which (absence) has the counter-positive-ness determined by a kind of self-someness relation, described by the occupancy determined by the relation inherence, is the absence which has counter
relation and which is locus of the absence of existence by the selfsome relation, adjunct of which is occurrence which is in subjectness which is determined by the relation of determinant of state of being reason and which (occurrence) is indicated by the locusness, which is indicated by indicatorness, existing in substanceness determined by substanceness-ness. That occurrence does not exists anywhere by the mentioned relation, therefore the absence of that occurrence exists in the substance also, therefore there is no fault of too narrow application with regard the valid reason, “subtanceness, belongs to the inference, it has generic attribute existence because it has substanceness.'
