Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
1. 20.] The nature of scripture knowledge and its distinctions
The reason for the distinction in scripture knowledge is due to the destruction and subsidence of the scripture-obscuring karma. This statement does not clarify the difference between the two, as the distinction in the destruction and subsidence is not ordinarily comprehensible.
Response: Matijnana (intuitive knowledge) pertains to the existing object, while scripture knowledge pertains to the past, present, and future topics. Apart from this distinction, there is also the difference that in Matijnana, there is no verbal mention, whereas in scripture knowledge, there is. Therefore, the conclusive definition of both is that the knowledge that includes "verbal mention" albeit being sensory and mental in origin is scripture knowledge, while the absence of "verbal mention" signifies Matijnana. In summary, although both relate similarly to sensory and mental aspects, the subject of scripture is more extensive and clearer than that of Matijnana, because in scripture, the predominance of mental activity leads to more detailed and clear considerations, and a sequential order is maintained. In other words, the preliminary immature aspect of sensory and mental knowledge corresponds to Matijnana, and the subsequent mature and clear part corresponds to scripture knowledge. Hence, it is also stated that the knowledge that can be articulated in language is scripture knowledge, while that which does not attain a degree fit for articulation is Matijnana. Scripture knowledge is like milk, whereas Matijnana is like cream.
Question - How are there two, many, and twelve types of scripture?
Response - Scripture knowledge is of two types: external (Angabahya) and internal (Angapravesh). Among these, external scripture is of many kinds based on the distinction of immediate versus historical context. Internal scripture exists in the form of the twelve Angas such as Acharanga, Sutrakritanga, etc.
Question - What is the difference between external and internal in what respect?
Response - In respect to the speaker's distinction. The knowledge revealed by Tirthankaras, which their supremely intelligent and direct disciples (Ganadhara) assimilated and categorized into the twelve limbs (Dwadashanga), is considered internal; and observing the deficiencies in understanding, strength, and age, the teachings following those Ganadhara by pure-minded Acharyas regarding various topics from the same twelve limbs for the benefit of the general populace are considered external scripture. In other words, the texts authored by Ganadhara are internal scripture, and those authored by other Acharyas are external scripture.
Question - What are the twelve limbs? What are the main ancient texts in the various forms of external scripture?
1. The meaning of "verbal mention" relates to the period of practical utility, that is, the emerging powers of words; it implies that just as indication, recollection, and adherence to scripture texts are necessary at the time of scripture knowledge's emergence, such requirements are not necessary in the emergence of Matijnana.