________________
Vada ] Ganadharavāda
:47: exists, is true, as it is my statement. Or, it is correct owing to its being a statement of an Omniscient Being, as is the case with the statement of one whom you look upon as Omniscient. (1577).
टीका-"जीवोऽस्ति" इत्येतद् वचः सत्यम् , मद्वचनत्वात् , मवत्संशयविषयाद्यवशेषवचनवत् , यच्च सत्यं न भवति तद् मदीयवचनमपि न भवति, यथा कूटसाक्षिवचनम् । अथवा सत्यं “जीवोऽस्ति" इति वचनम् , सवज्ञवचनत्वात् , भवदनुमतसर्वज्ञवचनवदिति ॥ २९ (१५७७)॥
D. C.-Just as my statement about your doubt is correct 80 this statement of mine that the soul exists is correct; for, it is my statement. The statement which is not correct, is not mine, e. g., the scatement of a false witness. Or, the correct. ness of this statement can be also established as under :
The statement that the soul exists is correct, because it is the statement of an Omniscient Being, as is the case with & statement of one whom you look upon as sarvajña. | मय-राग-दोस-मोहाभावाओ सचमणइवाइं च ।
सव्वं चिय मे वयणं जाणय मज्झत्थवयणं व ॥३०॥ (१५७८) Bhayg-rage-dosar-mohibhavas saccamayairaim car Savvam ciya me vayaņam jāraya majjhatthavayaņam va. 30 (1578) [भय-राग-द्वेष-मोहाभावात् सत्यमनतिपाति च ।
सत्यमेव मे वचनं ज्ञायकमध्यस्थवचनमिव ॥ ३०॥ (१५७८) Bhaya-rāga-dvèşa-mohābhāvāt satyam anatipāti ca ! Satyam dva md vacanam jdāyakamadhyasthavacanam iva. 30 (1578)]
Trans.-30. Everything that I say, is certainly true and free from any fault, on account of the (complete) absence of fear, attachment, aversion and infatuation (in me) as is the case with the words of an intelligent and impartial person. (1578)
टीका-सर्वमपि मद्वचनं सत्यमनतिपाति च बोधव्यम् , भय-समदेषा-ज्ञानरहितत्वात , इह यद् भयादिरहितस्य वचनं वत सत्यं स्य, पथा
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
