________________
Vada ] Canadharayıda
493 ___D. C.--It is no use insisting exclusively upon nityala of mu klātmā. Its a-uit yatü could also be admitted to a certain extent by means of various methods. But, realy speaking, all objects are susceptible to utpāda-wyaya-and ahrauvya ॥ 43811 (1986)
For a detailed discussion of bandha and mokşı, see Chap. VI.
Now, in reply to the assertion that the extinctien of soul resembles that of lamp etc, the author states
न य सव्वहा विणासोऽणलस्स परिणामओ पयस्सेव । कुंभस्स कवालाण व तहाविगारोवलंभाओ ।। ४३९ ॥ (१९८७)
Na ya savvahā viņāso’ņalassa pariņāmaö payasséva / Kumbhassa kavālāņa va tahāvigārovalambhão 1 439 II (1987) [न च सर्वथा विनाशोऽनलस्य परिणामतः पयस इव ।
कुम्भस्य कपालानामिव तथाविकारोपलभ्मात् ॥ ४३९ ॥ (१९८७) Na ca sarvathā vināso'nalasya pariāmatah payasa iva i Kumbhasya kapālanāmiva tathāvikāropalambhat || 439 ॥ (1987),
Trans.-459 Fire being mutable like milk, does not vanish entirely, because of the apprehension of changes like those (in case) of the pieces of ghata. (1987)
टीका--न प्रदीपानलस्य सर्वप्रकारैविनाशः, परिणामत्वात्, पयसो दुग्धस्येव; अथवा, यथा मुद्गराधाहतस्य कपालतया परिणतस्य घटस्य, यथा वा चूणीकृतानां कपालानाम् । कुतो न सर्वथा विनाशः ? । इत्याह-तथा तेन रूपान्तरप्रकारेण विकारस्य प्रत्यक्षादिप्रमाणोपलम्भादिति ॥ ४३९ ॥ (१९८७)
___D. C.-When a lamp. is extinguished its. fire does not enirely vanish. It is only mutable like milk. So, like milk turning into curds or like ghata changing into various pieces
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
