________________
Vada ] Canadharavāda
389 Abhasitasca Jinena jati-jara-marayavipramukténa । Namnā ca gotréņa ca sarvajnéna sarvadarsină 433811 (1886)]
Trans.--338 He was then, addressed by his name and lineage, by the Tirthankara who was entirely free from birth, old age, and death, who was omniscient, and who had complete darsana ( undifferentiated knowledge. ) ( 1886 )
The Tirthafikara, then, saysकि मण्णे नेरइया अस्थि नथि त्ति संसओ तुज्झं । वेयपयाण य अत्थं न याणसी तेसिमो अत्थो॥ ३३९ ॥ (१८८७) Kim manné Neraiyā atthi natthi tti samsai tujjham i Véyapayāna ya atthaim na yāṇasî tésimo attho 13391 (1887) [किं मन्यसे नैरयिकाः सन्ति न सन्तीति संशयस्तव ।
वेदपदानां चार्थ न जानासि तेषामयमर्थः ॥ ३३९ ॥ (१८८७) Kim manyasé nairayikāh santi na santiti samsayastava Védapadānām cârtham na jānāsi teşāmayamarthaḥ 1133911 (1887)]
Trans.--339 What are you thinking about? You entertain the doubt as to whether the denizens of hell exist or not. (But) you have not understood the real meaning of the sentences of the Vedas Here is their (real) interpretation. (1887)
टीका--किनारकाः सन्ति न वा ? इति त्वं मन्यसे। अयं च तब संशयो विरुद्धवेदपदश्रवणनिबन्धनः, तथाहि--" नारको वै एंष जायते यः शद्धाममनाति" इत्यादि एष ब्राह्मणो नारको जायते यःशूद्रानमनातीत्यर्थः, इत्यादीनि वाक्यानि नारकसत्ताप्रतिपादकानि, “न ह वै प्रत्य नारकाः सन्ति" इत्यादीनि तु नारकाभावप्रतिपादकानि । तत्रैषां वेदपदानामर्थ, च शब्दाद् युक्तिहदर्य च त्वं न जानासि, यत एतेषामयं वक्ष्यमाणोऽर्थ इति ॥ ३३९ ॥ (१८८७)
D. C.-What are you thinking about ? Your doubt about the existence of Narakas is based upon your hearing the
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
