________________
Vada ) Ganadharavada
:225 [ इतरथा ह्खाभावे सर्वविनाशो भवेद् दीर्घस्य ।
न च सः, तसात् सत्तादयोऽनपेक्षा घटादीनाम् ॥ १६७॥ (१७१५) Itaratbā brasvābhāvd sarvavināšo bhaved dirghasya i Na ca sah, tasmāt sattadayo'napdksa ghatadinām. 167 (1715)]
Trans.-167 Otherwise, in the absence of hrāsva, there should have been an absolute negation of dirgha also. But that is not so. Hence, the existence etc., of ghata etc., are (established as ) independant of (their) apòkşā (to other objects). ( 1715)
टीका-इतरथा-यदि घटादीनां सत्तादयोऽप्यन्यापेक्षया भवेयुः, तदा इखाभावे इखस्य सर्वविनाशे दीर्घस्यापि वस्तुनः सर्वविनाशः स्यात्, इखसत्तापेक्षित्वाद् दीर्घसत्तादीनाम् । न चैवमसौ दीर्घस्य सर्वविनाशो दृश्यते । तमात् निश्चीयते-सन्त्यन्यानपेक्षा एव घटादीनां सत्ता-रूपादयो धर्माः, तत्सत्वे चापास्ता शून्यतेति ॥१६७॥ (१७१५)
D. C.-If the qualities like existence etc., of the objects such as ghata etc, were dependant upon their comparision with other objects, destruction of a hrasva object would have effected the destruction of a dirgha object also. But really speaking, existence etc, of a dirgha object, are not denied when a hrasva object turns into an absolute negation. This leads us to the conclusion that objects like ghata eto., have their properties such as existence, rupa, eto., totally independant of their apèkşā to other objects, and hence, the idea of allpervading negation is automatically refuted. जावि अविक्खाऽविक्खणमविक्खगोऽविक्खणिजमणविक्ख । सा न मया सव्वेसु वि संतेसु न सुन्नया नाम ॥१६८॥ (१७१६) किंचि सओ तह परओ तदुभयओ किंचि निश्चसिद्धं पि । जलओ घडओ पुरिसो तहं ववहारओ नेयं ॥१६९॥ (१७१७)
29
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org