________________
180: Jinxbhadra Gani's
[ The second pumposo. If Isvara orvates body without any purpose he would be taken as frantic, and if he does so with some intention he would lose his Isvaratva. For a siddha and anādi ātman is not expected to cherish desire for creating deha eto., as desire is one of the forms of illusion and so on. A number of such arguments could be advanced in this connection, but for fear of grantha-vistāra (extension of the work ) they are zot stated here. But in line of the arguments stated above, it can also be proved that neithes Brahmā nor Visņu nor any one else, can be taken as the Kartâ of śarira eto.
Isvara therefore is not acceptable as the creator of śarira oto, from any point of view, but jiva accompanied by the upakarana Karman, should alone be ascepted as the kartā of sarira eto.
अहव सहावं मन्नसि विण्णाणघणाइवेयवुत्ताओ। तह बहुदोसं गोयम! ताणं च पयाणमयमंत्थो ॥२५॥ (१६४३) Ahava sahāvam mannasi viņņāņa ghaņāi Vàyavuttão 1 Faba bahudasama Goyama i tanam ca payāṇaniayamattho. 95 (1643) [अथवा स्वभावं मन्यसे विज्ञानघनादिवेदोक्तात् ।
तथा बहुदोषं गौतम! तेषां च पदानामयमर्थः ॥९५॥ (१६४३) Athavă svabhāvam mangasd vijñāpaghanādivədoktāti Tathā bahudosam Gautamal taşām ca padānāmayapaarthaḥ. 95(1643)
Trans.-95 Again, O Gautama ! if you think svabhāvam ( to be the karta of sartra etc.), from the sentences of the Vadas such as " vijfānaghana” etc. a number of difficulties will arise. But (ca) the real interpretation of those sentences is this.
pomy "gra gård it axe;" şoula #qanaxana स्वमा देहादीनां कर्तारं मन्यसे, यतः केचिदाहु :
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org