Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
26. If two bhikkhus (monks) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
27. If two ganavatshedikas (group leaders) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
28. If two acharyas (preceptors) or two upadhyayas (teachers) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
29. If many bhikkhus are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
30. If many ganavatshedikas (group leaders) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
31. If many acharyas (preceptors) or upadhyayas (teachers) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.
32. If many bhikkhus, many ganavatshedikas (group leaders), and many acharyas (preceptors) or upadhyayas (teachers) are wandering together, it is not proper for them to live together as equals. However, it is proper for them to live together with the senior (ratnadhika) as the leader.