Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[170] [Prajñāpanasūtra [1002 pr.] Bhagavan! Ākāśa-thiggal (arthaat-lok) kis se spasht hai?, kitne kāyo se spasht hai?, kya (vah) dharmastikāya se sprusht hai, ya dharmastikāya ke desh se sprusht hai, athava dharmastikāya ke pradesho se spasht hai? Isi prakar (kya vah) adharmastikāya se (tatha adharmastikāya ke desh se. ya pradesho se) spasht hai? (Athava vah) ākāśastikāya se, (ya uske desh, ya pradesho se) sprusht hai? Inhi bhedon ke anusar (kya vah pudgalastikāya se, jīvastikāya se, tatha pṛthvīkāyādi se lekar) yāvat (vanaspatikāya tatha) trasakāya se spasht hai? (Athava kya vah) addhā-samaya se sprusht hai? [1002 u.] Gautama! (Vah ākāśathiggal = lok dharmastikāya se spasht hai, dharmastikāya ke desh se sprusht nahin hai, dharmastikāya ke pradesho se spasht hai; isi prakar adharmastikāya se bhi (spasht hai, adharmastikāya ke desh se spasht nahin, adharmastikāya ke pradesho se spasht hai 1) ākāśastikāya se sprusht nahin hai, ākāśastikāya ke desh se spasht hai tatha ākāśastikāya ke pradesho se spasht hai (tatha pudgalastikāya, jīvastikāya evam pṛthvīkāyādi se lekar) yāvat vanaspatikāya se spasht hai, trasakāya se kathंचित् spasht hai aur kathंचित् spasht nahin hai, addhā-samaya (kāladravy) se desh se spasht hai tatha desh se spasht nahin hai. 1003. [1] Jambūddīve ṇam bhante! Dīve kiṇṇā phuḍe? Katihiṁ vā kāehi phuḍe? Ki dhammatthikāeṇam jāv māgāsasthikāeṇam phuḍe? Goyamā! Po dhammasthikāraṇam phuḍe dhammasthikāyass dešeṇam phuḍe dhammasthikāyass paesehi phuḍe, evam adhammasthikāyass vi bhāgāsasthikāyass ghi, puḍhavikāiyeṇam phuḍe jāv vaṇapphaikaieṇam phuḍe, tasakāeṇam siya phuḍe siya ṇo phuḍe, praddhāsamaeṇam phuḍe / [1003-1 pr.] Bhagavan! Jambūdvīpa nāmak dvīp kis se sprusht hai? Ya (vah) kitne kāyo se sprusht hai? Kya vah dharmastikāya se (lekar pūrvōktānusār) yāvat ākāśastikāya se sprusht hai? (Pūrvōkt paripāṭī ke anusār 'addhā-samaya' tak ke sparsha-sambandhī sabhi praśna yahān samajhne chahiye.) [1003-1 u.] Gautama! (Vah) dharmastikāya (samgra) se sprusht nahin hai, kintu) dharmastikāya ke desh se sprusht hai tatha dharmastikāya ke pradesho se sprusht hai / Isi prakar vah adharmastikāya aur ākāśastikāya ke desh aur pradesho se sprusht hai, pṛthvīkāya se (lekar) yāvat vanaspatikāya se sprusht hai (tatha) trasakāya se kathंचित् sprusht hai, kathंचित् sprusht nahin hai; addhā-samaya (kāladravy) se sprusht hai. [2] Evam lavaṇasamuddhe dhāyisaṇḍe dīve kāloē samuddē abhitarpukkharaḍḍh / bāhirpukkharaḍḍh evam cheva, ṇavarṁ praddhāsamaeṇam ṇo phuḍe / evam jāv sayambhuramāṇe samuddē / esā parivāḍī imāhi gāhāhiṁ aṇugantavvā / tam jahā jambūddīve lavaṇe dhāyi kaaloē pukkharae varuṇe. Khīra ghata khōta nandi ya aruṇavare kuḍale ruyē // 204 // āmaraṇa-vatya-gandhe uppala-tilaē ya puḍhavi-nihi-rayaṇe / vāsahara-daha-nadośhro vijayā vakkhāra-kappidā // 20 //
**Translation:**
[170] [Prajñāpanasūtra [1002 pr.] Bhagavan! Ākāśa-thiggal (meaning - lok) is clear from what?, how many kāyas is it clear from?, is it clear from dharmastikāya, or from the country of dharmastikāya, or from the regions of dharmastikāya? Similarly (is it clear from) adharmastikāya (and from the country of adharmastikāya, or from the regions)? (Or is it clear from) ākāśastikāya, (or from its country, or regions)? According to these distinctions (is it clear from pudgalastikāya, jīvastikāya, and from pṛthvīkāyādi onwards) up to (vanaspatikāya and) trasakāya? (Or is it clear from) addhā-samaya? [1002 u.] Gautama! (It is clear from dharmastikāya, not from the country of dharmastikāya, but from the regions of dharmastikāya; similarly, it is clear from adharmastikāya (but not from the country of adharmastikāya, but from the regions of adharmastikāya 1) It is not clear from ākāśastikāya, but it is clear from the country of ākāśastikāya and from the regions of