Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[All beings are accessible] [175 One should know the statement of the embodied and disembodied as proven and well-known. 236. Or, all beings are of two types, namely, charma and acharma / O Bhagavan! How long does charma remain in the charma state? Gautama! Charma is anadi-saparyavasit. Acharma is of two types: anadi-aparyavasit and sadi-aparyavasit / There is no difference between the two. In terms of alpabahutva, acharma is the least, and charma is infinitely more numerous than them. (This is the complete understanding of the two types of all beings.) Discussion: The two types of all beings, charma and acharma, are described in this sutra / The special bhavyas who will become siddhas are called charma. Those who are opposite to them are called acharma. These acharma are abhavyas and siddhas / In the kayasthiti sutra, charma is anadi-saparyavasit, otherwise it cannot be called charma. In the acharma sutra, acharma is of two types: anadi-aparyavasit and sadi-aparyavasit / Anadi-aparyavasit-acharma is the abhavyas, and sadi-aparyavasit-acharma is the siddhas. There is no difference between the two in the antaradwar. There is no difference between anadi-saparyavasit-charma, because once charmatva is attained, it is not possible to attain it again. Whether acharma is anadi-aparyavasit or sadi-aparyavasit, there is no difference, because they do not attain charmatva. In the alpabahutva sutra, acharma is the least, because only abhavyas and siddhas are acharma. Charma is infinitely more numerous than them. This statement should be understood in relation to the general bhava, otherwise it cannot be infinitely more numerous / As the original commentator has said: "Charma is infinitely more numerous / This should be understood in relation to the general bhavyas. The subject division of the sutras is difficult to understand." Thus, the various understandings regarding all beings are complete. The verse that summarizes the two types of statements mentioned here is as follows: Siddhasaindiyakae joae veae kasayalesa ya / Nanuvogaahara bhasasariri ya charamo ya / / Its meaning is clear. 1. "Charma is infinitely more numerous, this should be understood in relation to the general bhavyas. The subject division of the sutras is difficult to understand."]