Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[Sixfold Classification of the Fifth Understanding] [139] Among the subtle ones, there are few sufficient and many insufficient *sankeeyaguṇa*, and among the *bādar* there are few sufficient and many insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*. (5) The fifth *alpabahutva* is said to be the combined form of all these. It is as follows: The fewest *bādar* are *tejaskāyik* sufficient, then *bādar* *traskāyik* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *traskāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then each body *bādar* *vanaspatikāyik* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *nigoda* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *pṛthvīkāyik* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *apkāyik* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *vāyukāyik* sufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *tejaskāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then each body *bādar* *vanaspatikāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *nigoda* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *pṛthvīkāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *apkāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then *bādar* *vāyukāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, *kāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then subtle *pṛthvīkāyik* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *apkāyik* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *vāyukāyik* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *tejaskāyik* insufficient *sankeeyaguṇa*, then subtle *pṛthvīkāyik* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *apkāyik* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *vāyukāyik* sufficient *viśeṣādhika*, then subtle *nigoda* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, then subtle *nigoda* sufficient *sankeeyaguṇa*. (Although these *bādar* from sufficient *tejaskāy* to sufficient *nigoda* are said elsewhere to be equally numerous as the regions of the infinite *lokākāśa*, there should be no contradiction in understanding that there are infinite varieties of the infinite, and therefore, where *asankeeyaguṇa*, *sankeeyaguṇa*, and *viśeṣādhika* are mentioned here, they should not be considered contradictory.) From those sufficient subtle *nigoda*, there are *bādar* *vanaspatikāyik* insufficient *anantaguṇa*. From them, there are ordinary *bādar* sufficient *viśeṣādhika*, from them *bādar* *vanaspatikāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, from them ordinary *bādar* insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, from them ordinary *bādar* *viśeṣādhika*, from them subtle *vanaspatikāyik* insufficient *asankeeyaguṇa*, from them ordinary subtle insufficient *viśeṣādhika*, from them subtle *vanaspatikāyik* sufficient *sankeeyaguṇa*, from them ordinary subtle sufficient *viśeṣādhika*, from them ordinary sufficient-insufficient *viśeṣaṇa* free subtle *viśeṣādhika*.
**Nigoda**
**Statement:** 222. How many kinds are there, *bhaṇte*, of *ṇipoya* *paṇṇattā*? **Gotama:** There are two kinds of *ṇipoya* *paṇṇattā*, namely, *ṇiyo* and *ṇinodajīva*.
**Statement:** *Bhaṇte*, how many kinds are there of *ṇiyo* *paṇṇattā*? **Gotama:** There are two kinds, namely, *suhamaniyoda* and *bādaraniyoda*.
**Statement:** *Bhaṇte*, how many kinds are there of *suhamanipoya* *paṇṇattā*? **Gotama:** There are two kinds, namely, *pajjattga* and *apajjattga*.
**Statement:** There are two kinds of *bāyaraniyoda*, namely, *pajjattā* and *apajjattā*.
**Statement:** *Bhaṇte*, how many kinds are there of *ṇinodajīva* *paṇṇattā*? **Gotama:** There are two kinds, namely, *suhamaninigodajīva* and *bādarinigoyajīva*.
**Statement:** There are two kinds of *suhamaninigodajīva*, namely, *pajjattga* and *apajjattga*.
**Statement:** There are two kinds of *bāyarinigodajīva*, namely, *pajjattga* and *apajjattga*.