Agam 27 Chhed 04 Dashashrut Skandh Sutra Sthanakvasi

SR No.: 002908
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Atmaram Maharaj
Publisher: Padma Prakashan
Publication Year: 2001
Total Pages: 576
Language: Hindi, English
Classification: Book_Devnagari, Book_English, Agam, Canon, Conduct, & agam_dashashrutaskandh
File Size: 11 MB

Page 57

*
400
"वंदामीति वन्दे भद्रबाहुं प्राचीनगोत्रोत्पन्नं चरमसकलश्रुतज्ञानिनं श्रुतकेवलिनमित्यर्थः । तेन सूत्राणां दशाश्रुतस्कन्धबृहत्कल्पव्यवहाराणां सूत्रयितारम् । सूत्रत्वममीषां सम्पूर्णम् । चतुर्दशपूर्वधरविरचितत्वेन तथोच्यते-सुत्तं गणहर-रइयं तहेव पत्तेयबुद्धरइयं सुकेवलिणा रइयं अभिन्नदसपुग्विणा रइयमिति । नन्वेवं श्रावकस्य निर्युक्त्यादिदानिर्युक्तीनामपि समानकर्तृत्वेन सूत्रत्वमापन्नम्, आपद्यतानाम तासमपि समवायांगे सूत्रात्मकप्रतिपादनात् । तथाहि- आचारस्स णं परित्ता वायण संखिज्जा अणुओ गदारा संखिज्जाओ पडिवत्तीओ संखिज्जा वेढा, संखिज्जा सिलोगा संखिज्जाओ निज्जुत्तीओ । से णं अंगठ्ठयाए पढमे अंगे दो सुयकखंधा बीसं अज्झयणेत्यादि वाचनादीनाञ्चाचाराङगसरूप निरूपणेनाचाराङगत्वमुक्तम् । तथा च स्वतः सिद्धं निर्युक्तेः सूत्रत्वम् । अत एवोच्यतेऽनुयोगद्वारसूत्रमिति नियुक्तिरप्यनुयोग एवेत्यलमतिप्रसङगेन अथ किं निमित्तम् । तस्य नमस्कारः क्रियते । स चोच्यते सूत्रकारको न त्वर्थकारकः । अर्थो हि तीर्थकृद्भ्यः प्रसूतो येनोच्यते “अत्थं भासइ अरिहा सुत्तं गंथंति गणहरा निउणं सासणस्स हियट्ठाए तओ सुत्तं पवत्तइति” कृतं सूत्रं दशाः कल्पो व्यवहारश्च कुतस्तत् (स्व) सुद्धृतमुच्यते, प्रत्याख्याननवपूर्वात्, अयं गाथा केनापि निर्युक्त्यनुयोगविधायिनाचार्येण स्वशिष्येभ्यो निर्युक्त्यनुयोगप्रतिपादनावसरे पारम्पर्य प्रदर्शनाय दशाश्रुतस्कन्धादिकर्तृत्वप्रतिपादनाय श्रीभद्रबाहवे नमस्करणाय च प्रतिपादितास्तीति सम्भाव्यते । स्वेनैव स्वस्य नमस्कृतेरनुपपद्यमानत्वात् । नहि महान्तो निकृष्टजनोचितं स्वमुखेन स्वस्ववर्णनमाद्रियन्ते । दृश्यते ते च सत्प्रतिपादकसत्यप्रतिपाद्यगुरुशिष्यपरम्पराया तत्त्वेन स्ववचसि प्रत्योत्पादनाय तत्र-तत्र ज्ञाता धर्मकथादेः सुधर्मजम्बूस्वाम्यादीनां वर्णनं प्रभवादिभिलिखितमित्य एव 'तित्थयरे भंते' इत्यादि । इस प्रकार इस वृत्ति में श्री भद्रबाहु स्वामी इस सूत्र के सम्पादन करने वाले माने गये हैं । इसके अतिरिक्त दशवी दशा की समाप्ति में भी वृत्तिकार इस प्रकार लिखते हैं:
"स्वमनीषिकापरिहाराय भगवान् भद्रबाहुस्वामी प्राह तेणं कालेणं तेणं समएणं' इत्यादि | इस कथन से यह भी भली भांति सिद्ध किया गया है, भद्रबाहुस्वामी ने जो कुछ भी वर्णन किया है वह सब श्री श्रमण भगवान् महावीर स्वामी के कथन का ही अनुवाद-मात्र है । अपनी बुद्धि से उन्होंने कुछ भी नहीं कहा । यह प्रत्येक दशा के अन्त में भी स्पष्ट किया गया है । उपर्युक्त विवरण से पाठकों को इस बात के समझने में कोई भी बात अवशिष्ट न रही कि वास्तव में इस सूत्र के मूल प्रणेता तो श्री श्रमण भगवान् महावीर स्वामी ही
-do

Translation AI Generated

*
400
"I bow to Bhadrabahu, born of an ancient lineage, the ultimate knower of all scriptures, meaning the one who has attained omniscience (Shruta Kevali). He is the compiler of the Sutras, the ten Shruta Skandhas, the Brihat Kalpa, and the Vyavahara. The compilation of these is the essence of the Sutras. It is said that these were compiled by fourteen predecessors, as follows: Suttam, Ganahara, Raiyam, Tatheva, Patteya Buddharaiyam, Sukevalina Raiyam, Abhinna Dasapugvina Raiyam. Now, even though the Shravaka has attained the status of a Sutra due to the same authorship of the Nirukti and other Daniruktis, the same applies to the Apadyatas, as they are also included in the Sutra-like presentation of the Samvayaanga. For example, Acharassa nam paritta vayana sankhijjana anuo gadara sankhijjanao padivattiyo sankhijjana vedha, sankhijjana siloga sankhijjanao nijjuttiyo. Se nam angaththayae padhame ange do suyaka khandha bissan ajjhayanetiyadi vachanaadinaancha charaangasarup nirupane nacharaangattvamuktam. Thus, the Sutra-hood of the Nirukti is self-evident. Therefore, it is said that the Anuyoga Dvara Sutra is the Nirukti, as the Nirukti is also the Anuyoga. This is not a mere coincidence, but rather a necessity. Therefore, we bow to him. He is said to be the compiler of the Sutras, not the author of the meaning. The meaning is derived from the Tirthankaras, as it is said, "Attham bhasai ariha suttam ganthanti ganahara niunam sasanas sa hiyatthae tao suttam pavattaiti." The Sutras, the ten Kalpas, and the Vyavahara, from where did they come? It is said that they are authentic, as they are not contradicted by any previous accounts. This verse was likely composed by some Acharya who was a proponent of the Nirukti and Anuyoga, and who, while teaching the Nirukti and Anuyoga to his disciples, presented this lineage to demonstrate the authorship of the ten Shruta Skandhas, etc., and to pay homage to Shri Bhadrabahu. This is likely because it is not appropriate for someone to praise themselves. Great people do not praise themselves in their own words, as it is unbecoming of them. It is seen that in their own words, they praise the lineage of teachers and disciples who are true propagators of truth, as in the accounts of Sudharma Jambusvami, etc., who are known for their Dharmakatha, etc., as written by Prabhava, etc., as in "Titthayaare bhantae," etc. In this way, in this commentary, Shri Bhadrabahu Swami is considered to be the compiler of this Sutra. In addition, at the end of the tenth Dasha, the commentator writes, "Swamanishika pariharaaya bhagavan bhadrabahuswami praha tenam kalena tenam samaena," etc. This statement clearly proves that everything that Bhadrabahu Swami has described is merely a translation of the words of Shri Shraman Bhagavan Mahavira Swami. He did not say anything from his own intellect. This is also made clear at the end of each Dasha. From the above description, there is no doubt left in the minds of the readers that the true originator of this Sutra is Shri Shraman Bhagavan Mahavira Swami.
-do