________________
xii
have been very useful if they were compared with Tibetan translations but for that publication of the Sanskrit originals would have been withheld for another year, which would not have been good, seeing that some of scholars are already busy with the Tibetan translations of these works. I may give the result of the comparison in some future issues of this journal and at the same time something about the internal materials of the text and commentary of the Vādanyāya. I am hoping to visit again the Tibetan depositories of Sanskrit mss. in the near future, which may help me in collecting some more material for the purpose. Rāhula Sānkrityāyana
INTRODUCTION
