Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## 138
## Pindaniryukti
For a 'Krit' Sadhu, there are four 'Nishthit' categories. The second and fourth categories are conceivable, such as:
* Krit for Sadhu, Nishthit for Sadhu.
* Krit for Sadhu, Nishthit for Grihasth.
* Krit for Grihasth, Nishthit for Sadhu.
* Krit for Grihasth, Nishthit for Grihasth.
## 82. There are four faults related to Adhakarma: Atikram, Vyatikrama, Atichar, and Anachar. One should know the demonstration of these four. The first is Atikram, meaning invitation for Adhakarma.
## 82/1. A new Shravak invites a Muni to donate Shali, Ghrit, Gud, Goras, and new Valli fruits that are not suitable for a Muni.
## 82/2. A Muni who accepts and consumes Adhakarma, consumes all four faults, including Atikram. The example of Nupurharika is relevant here. In the Nupurharika story, the king's elephant raises one, two, three, and then all four legs.
## 82/3. One who accepts the invitation for Adhakarma commits the fault of Atikram. Raising the leg to bring it is the fault of Vyatikrama. Accepting the Adhakarma in a vessel is the fault of Atichar, and swallowing it is the fault of Anachar.
## 83. As previously stated (Ga. 60), there are faults like Agyabhang, etc., in accepting Adhakarma. These faults are: Agyabhang, Anvastha, Mithyatva, and Viradhana.
## 83/1. One who accepts Adhakarma due to greed for food, etc., violates the commands of all Tirthankaras. One who violates the command, by whose command does he follow the remaining rituals?
## 83/2. If one Muni performs an inappropriate act (consumes Adhakarma), other Munis, based on their faith, start performing the same act. This way, due to the tradition of many Munis, restraint and penance are broken, leading to the breaking of the Tirth. (This is an example of the fault of Anvastha.)
1. For detailed explanation of the story, see Pari. 3, Katha San. 10.
2. Just as an elephant can raise one, two, or three legs on a mountain with broken peaks, but falls to the ground when it raises all four legs, similarly, a Sadhu can purify himself with specific good determination until the fault of Atichar, but with Anachar, restraint is destroyed. The commentator says that although the elephant did not raise all four legs in the story, it was stated to prove the point in the parable (Mavri P. 68).
3. According to Jitkalpabhashya, some Acharyas consider keeping Adhakarma food in the mouth as Anachar, but the Sadhu can refrain from it. He can spit it out into a nearby vessel, but after swallowing, it is not possible to refrain, therefore, swallowing Adhakarma food should be considered Anachar (Jibha 1179, 1180).