Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**137**
**80.** Rice that has been washed three times is considered "**niṣṭhita**" (purified), and rice that has been washed once or twice is considered "**kṛta**" (prepared). The **Tīrthaṅkaras** have considered **niṣṭhita kṛta** rice as having two **ādhākarma** (impurities): one **ādhākarma** due to the **kṛta** rice form and the other **ādhākarma** due to the cooking process. 80/1. Some **Ācāryas** prohibit sitting under the shade of a tree planted for the benefit of a **sādhu** (monk) for the purpose of enjoying fruits, flowers, or any other reason. However, this is not appropriate. It is conceivable to consume the fruit of that tree in a different **bhaṅga** (state), i.e., as "**kṛta**" for the **sādhu** and "**niṣṭhita**" for the **gṛhastha** (householder). 80/2. The shade of a tree is not **ādhākarmic** because the shade is **parapratyayika** (dependent on something else), i.e., it is caused by the sun, not solely by the tree. Just as a **mālākara** (gardener) cultivates a tree, the shade is not cultivated by the tree. Those who prohibit sitting under the shade of a tree, considering it **ādhākarmic**, would then consider it permissible to sit under that tree when the shade disappears due to the sky being covered by clouds. 80/3. The shade increases and decreases. The increasing shade of a tree touches many houses. It is not conceivable that all those houses and food would become impure due to **pūti doṣa** (impurity). (This is not mentioned in the **Āgamas**). The sun does not cause the shade for the **munis** (ascetics) who are **suvihit** (well-behaved), it occurs naturally. Therefore, it is not **ādhākarmic**. 80/4. When scattered clouds move across the sky, the shade disappears and reappears during the day. When the sun is covered by clouds, it is permissible to sit under the tree, but it should be avoided during the heat of the sun. (This fact is neither mentioned in the **Āgamas** nor recorded by the **pūrvapurṣas** (predecessors), therefore it is false). 80/5. Thus, this fault related to shade is not possible. It is free from **ādhākarma**. Even so, those who are very compassionate and avoid it are not at fault.
**81, 81/1.** **Gṛhasthas** are considered **paraphakṣa** (other party) and **śramaṇas** and **śramaṇīs** (monks and nuns) are considered **svaphakṣa** (own party). What is cooked and prepared is considered "**niṣṭhita**", everything else is "**kṛta**". For a **sādhu**, "**kṛta**" and "**niṣṭhita**" are permissible, and for a **gṛhastha**,
1. The commentator **Malayagiri** mentions the **Vṛddha-sampradāya** (ancient tradition) in this context, stating that if rice is washed once or twice for the **sādhu** and a third time by the **gṛhastha** for themselves and cooked, then that rice is permissible for the **sādhu**. Other traditions are also mentioned in this context. One should understand **kṛta** and **niṣṭhita** in relation to **pān** (betel leaf), **khādim** (vegetables), and **svādim** (tasty food). If a well is dug for a **sādhu**, water is drawn from it, and it is prepared for drinking, then it is called "**kat**" until it is prepared for drinking, and after it is prepared for drinking, it is called "**niṣṭhita**". Similarly, in **khādim**, when cucumbers, etc., are sown and harvested, and then cut into pieces, those pieces are called "**kṛta**" until they are prepared for eating, and after they are prepared for eating, they are called "**niṣṭhita**" (**M.P. 65, 66**).
2. According to the commentator, some parts of the ground under a tree are contaminated with **saccitta kaṇas** (sentient particles), therefore it is impure. It is not permissible to sit in that place, but the shade of the tree is not **ādhākarmic** (**M.V.P. 66**).