Agam 41 Mool 02 Pind Niryukti Sutra

SR No.: 001945
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Dulahrajmuni
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati
Publication Year: 2008
Total Pages: 492
Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit, Hindi
Classification: Book_Devnagari, Agam, Canon, Ethics, & agam_pindniryukti
File Size: 9 MB

Page 202

50
पिंडनियुक्ति
७३/१४. लिंगेण उ नाभिग्गह; अणभिग्गहवीसुऽभिग्गही चेव।
जइ साग बितियभंगे, पत्तेयबुहा य तित्थगरा ॥ १५२ ॥ ७३/१५. एवं लिंगे भावण, दंसण नाणे य पढमभंगो उ।
___जइ साग वीसुनाणी, एवं चिय बितियभंगो वि॥ १५३ ॥ ७३/१६. दंसण चरणे पढमो, सावग जइणो य बीयभंगो उ।।
जइणो विसरिसदंसी, दंसे य अभिग्गहे वोच्छं ॥ १५४ ॥ ७३/१७. साग जइ वीसऽभिग्गह, पढमो बीओ य भावणा चेव।
नाणेण वि णेज्जेवं, एत्तो चरणेण वोच्छामि ॥१५५ ॥ ७३/१८. जइणो वीसाऽभिग्गह, पढमो बिय निण्ह -साग-जइणो वि।
एवं तु भावणासु वि, वोच्छं दोण्हं ति माणत्तो' ॥ १५६ ॥ ७३/१९. जइणो सावग निण्हग, पढमे बितिए य होंति भंगे य।
केवलनाणे तित्थंकरस्स नो कप्पति कतं तु॥१५७ ॥ ७३/२०. एमेव य लिंगेणं, दंसणमादी उ होंति भंगा उ।
भइएसु उवरिमेसुं, हिट्ठिल्लपदं तु वज्जेज्जा ॥ ७३/२१. पत्तेयबुद्ध-निण्हग', उवासए केवली वि आसज्ज।
खइयादिए य भावे, पडुच्च भंगे तु जोएज्जा ॥ १५८ ॥ ७३/२२. जत्थ उ ततिओ भंगो, तत्थ न कप्पं तु सेसए भयणा।।
'तित्थंकरकेवलिणो, जहकप्पं नो य'११ सेसाणं१२ ॥१५९ ॥ १. गहे (अ), ग्गहा (स)।
नियुक्तिकार निक्षेप परक गाथा की इतनी विस्तृत २. सावग (मु)।
व्याख्या नहीं करते अतः संभव लगता है कि इतनी ३. जयणो (स) सर्वत्र।
विस्तृत व्याख्या भाष्यकार ने की होगी फिर भी ४. वीसुभि (अ, ब)।
टीकाकार मलयगिरि के समय तक ये गाथाएं नियुक्ति ५. माणत्ता (ब)।
गाथा के रूप में प्रसिद्ध हो गई थीं। गा. ७३/९ में ६. बीए (अ, बी, क, स)।
मलयगिरि ने 'स्वयमेव श्रोतारो ऽभोत्स्यन्ते इति बुद्ध्या ७. जह (टीपा, ब, स)।
नियुक्तिकृन्नोदाहृतवान्' तथा गा. ७३/१४ में 'लिंगछडेज्जा (जीभा ११४२), यह गाथा केवल क प्रति दर्शन चतुर्भंगिकाद्यद्वयसदृशानीति कृत्वा नियुक्तिकृन्नोमें मिलती है।
दाहरति' का उल्लेख किया है। इससे स्पष्ट है कि ९. निण्हव (मु), निण्हय (क)।
ये गाथाएं नियुक्ति के रूप में प्रसिद्ध हो चुकी थीं। १०.व्यभा ९९४, तु. जीभा ११४४।
व्याख्यात्मक होने के कारण इनको निगा के क्रमांक ११. तित्थकर (बी), तित्थगरनिण्हओवासगादि कप्पे ण में नहीं रखा है। मूलद्वार गा. के 'कस्स' द्वार की (जीभा ११४५)।
व्याख्या गा. ७३ में तथा किं द्वार की व्याख्या ७५ में १२.७३/१-२२-ये बावीस गाथाएं ७३ वीं गाथा की है अतः विषय की दृष्टि से भी इनको नियुक्ति की
व्याख्या रूप हैं। नियुक्ति की रचना-शैली के अनुसार न मानने पर कोई बाधा उपस्थित नहीं होती है।
८.

Translation AI Generated

## 50
**Pindaniyukti**

73/14. Not by the sign; not by the sign, but by the sign.
If the ocean is broken in two, the path of the Tirthankara is the same. || 152 ||

73/15. Thus, the sign is the perception, the knowledge is the first breaking.
If the ocean is broken by the twenty, thus the second breaking is the same. || 153 ||

73/16. The knowledge is the first, the Savaga Jain is the second breaking.
The Jain forgets the knowledge, the knowledge is the sign, or the sign is the knowledge. || 154 ||

73/17. The ocean is the twenty signs, the first, the second, and the perception.
By knowledge, it is not so, I say this by the sign. || 155 ||

73/18. The Jain is the twenty signs, the first, the second, the ocean, and the Jain.
Thus, in the perceptions, I say both, this is the meaning. || 156 ||

73/19. The Jain is the Savaga, the sign, the first, the second, and the breaking.
The perfect knowledge of the Tirthankara does not apply, but it is done. || 157 ||

73/20. Thus, by the sign, the knowledge, etc., are the breaking.
In the upper ones, the lower word is to be understood. || 73/21 ||

73/21. The path of the Buddha, the sign, the fast, the Kevali is also attached.
In the feelings of the earth, etc., the breaking is to be understood. || 158 ||

73/22. Where there is the breaking of the three, there is no application of the rest.
The Tirthankara Kevali, the application is not of the eleven others. || 159 ||

1. Ghe (a), Ggaha (s).
2. Savaga (mu).
3. Jayano (s) everywhere.
4. Visubhi (a, b).
5. Manatta (b).
6. Bia (a, b, k, s).
7. Jah (tipa, b, s).
8. Lingachhadejja (jibha 1142), this verse is only found in the K darshan.
9. Ninhav (mu), Ninhay (k).
10. Vyabha 994, tu. Jibha 1144.
11. Titthakar (b), Titthagarnihnhovasagaadi kappe na (jibha 1145).
12. 73/1-22 - These twenty-two verses are of the 73rd verse, therefore, from the point of view of the subject, there is no obstacle in not considering them as a part of the niyukti.

The commentator does not explain the verses of the deposit-related verses in such detail, so it seems that the commentator must have explained them in detail. Even during the time of the commentator Malayagiri, these verses were known as niyukti verses. In verse 73/9, Malayagiri has mentioned 'svayameva shrotaro 'bhotsyante iti buddhya niyuktikrunnodahritavan' and in verse 73/14, he has mentioned 'lingachhadejja (jibha 1142), this verse is only found in the K darshan.
daharati'. This makes it clear that these verses were known as niyukti.
Because of being explanatory, they are not included in the number of the niyukti. The explanation of the 'kassa' door in the original door verse is in verse 73 and the explanation of the 'kim' door is in verse 75, therefore, from the point of view of the subject, there is no obstacle in not considering them as a part of the niyukti.