________________ JINESVARSURI'S GAHARAYANAKOSA 553 अन्नजुवइनेहेण" in the present Kosa. p. 35 v. 450 This gatha occurs in Gathasaptasati (VI. 18). There the text reads 'bahohabharia' and the reading 'bahulla-phuria' is recorded in the footnotes. The latter part of the second half in GS reads : 'Savahavattham gaam pemmam.' The Editors of the present Kosa read 'Satahavattham mae pimme' and add a question-mark. The SP (p. 1211) correctly reads: 'Savahavattham gae pemme.' p. 39 v 499 The opening words of this gatha present corrupt readings. The editors' emendation जं पि य [? पिय] मंगलवासणाए too is not helpful. We should read with Weber (No. 837) : जं पीअं मंगलवासणाए. "निट्ठइ" in the second half of this gatha is obviously a misreading or misprint or scribal error for "चिट्ठइ". p. 39 v. 501 The second half of this gatha reads differently in Lilavai from where this gatha is picked up : जाणं चिय पियविरहो जाणसु दुक्खीण ते पढमा / It is, of course, more meaningful. p. 39 v. 505 Gathasaptasati (No. II 53) presents somewhat different readings : विरह-करवत्त-दूसह-फालिज्जंतम्मि तीअ हिअअम्मि / अंसू कज्जलमइलं पमाणसुत्तं व्व पडिहाइ // These readings make better sense. p. 40 v. 516 The first half of these two gathas presents different readings : and पच्छामहो वि वियर पहरहओ अंबरं पि मोत्तूण / p. 72 v. 73 पच्छाभिमुहो वच्चइ पहरहओ अंबरं विमोत्तूण || The first half needs to be corrected as; पच्छाभिमुहो वच्चइ पहरहओ अंबरं पि मोत्तूणं / p. 41 v. 519 [वा ?]सं should be corrected as : सेसं v. 521 ज(? उ)ण वल्लहो should be corrected as जणवल्लहो 'सलिलपाय[? रय]" ' ' सलिल-पायडिय. v. 522 संचलणमासला " " " संगलणमासला v. 524 The first half should be read as : मुह-घडिय-वियड-रवि-कणय-पिंड-भारोणायग्ग-भाएण / v. 525 मोलाय(यं)तम्मि should be corrected to मउलायंतम्मि Stud.-70 522 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org