Studies in Jain Literature

SR No.: 001868
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: V M Kulkarni
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre
Publication Year: 2001
Total Pages: 114
Language: English
Classification: Book_English, Literature, & Story
File Size: 14 MB

Page 570

552 STUDIES IN JAIN LITERATURE 818), Dhvanyaloka (p. 237, N. S. Ed.) contains this gatha. Weber too includes it in his edition of Gathasaptasati (No. 954). अणुदिअह-कआभोआ जह जह थणआ विणिति कुमरीए / बालाए / तह तह लद्धोआसो / लद्धावासो व्व वम्महो हिअअमाविसइ // p. 26 v. 329 This gatha belongs to Lilavas (No. 423). There it opens with the words "तो तस्स मियंकस्स" whereas here it opens with “सा तस्स मियंकस्स". The reading वाउल्लिय व्व (Sk पुत्तलिका, cf/Mar. बाहुली) is perfectly all right and the emendation "वा(धी)-उल्लिय्यव्व" is uncalled for. p. 27 v. 338 The reading 31713Fi is unintelligible. The reading given in the footnote too is equally unintelligible. Gathasaptasati (IV. 6) preserves the correct reading : अव्वो अणुणअसुह' p. 27 v. 339 There is no need to emend the text as Guit [? ] FUTT. Read in this connection the gloss of Mathuranath Shastri on G. S. VI. 24... " ga 074: (f45a:) gari la: 1" NS ed. p. 268. p. 27 v. 342 The reading in the present Kosa (F5478 helm needs to be corrected to (दइयनह) दूमियाण in accordance with the original reading in Gathasaptasati. p. 28 v. 355 In Gathasaptasati (II. 99) as well as in Sarasvatikanthabharana (p. 373) we have the reading "JE TA fogh' whereas here we have "जह अहं दिट्ठो". The reading अहं would mean the nayaka himself is the speaker whereas the reading Th would mean that the speaker is a female messenger pleading the cause of nayika. p. 29 v. 363 As stated above (Note to p. 27 v. 339) there is no need to emend the text as जणो [? 5] जणो here also. p. 30 v. 383 Ranaranayarujjaduccalaehim (?)- This gatha is cited in Srngaraprakasa (p. 1067). But there the text shows some gaps and presents a few incorrect readings. A comparision of these two texts helps us in restoring the original gatha. The reading "ranaranaarajja dovvala..." in SP gives us a clue to correct the doubtful reading in the present Kosa as 'ranaranaya-rujja dubbalaehim.' p. 31 v. 390 The editors proposed emendation well agrees with the corresponding reading in Gathasaptasati (Ta). p. 34 v. 430 The reading in Vajjalagga (v. 346) is fage 370 coda in place of 'TE