Studies in Jain Literature

SR No.: 001868
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: V M Kulkarni
Publisher: Shardaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre
Publication Year: 2001
Total Pages: 114
Language: English
Classification: Book_English, Literature, & Story
File Size: 14 MB

Page 569

JINESVARSURI'S GAHARAYANAKOSA 551 "Turpferei ufifgai JO". "quefaqj" is patently a corrupt reading and hardly makes any sense. p. 12 v. 139 The reading '756' is obviously a printing mistake for afic. As it is not indicated in the list of corrections it is noted here. P. 15 v. 173 This gatha belongs to Gaudavaho (No. 976). There we have the reading "गरुअत्तणेण विहडंति" instead of "गरुयत्तणे न विहडंति" in the present Kosa. p. 16 v. 193 The original reading Gas (Vam to expand, bloom, open) suits the context all right as a bed or assemblage of lotuses blooms at sunrise. The editor's emendation 675 neither suits the context nor is happy. p. 17 v. 213 The gatha, as it stands, does not construe well. With slight emendations if it is rewritten, it yields good sense: लच्छीए गाढमालिगिओ ति (? सि) इय चिंतिऊण कित्तीए (? कित्तीअ) / ईसाउरेव पेच्छसु नरिंद भुवणे परिब्भमइ / / "Laksmi and Kirti are looked upon as King's two wives. Kirti thinks that the king is embraced by Laksmi; naturally, she is full of jealousy, as it were, (and out of jealousy, anger) she wanders over the whole earth. O King, look." It is a fine instance of Vyajastuti (helped by Utpreksa). p. 19 v. 236 The gatha, as presented here, does not yield a happy sense. The Kosa called Chappannayagahao presents it somewhat differently. We may profitably compare their text. तिसु जे अवुत्थपुव्वा रायकुले महियले य सेवासु / fauurtat-7001-CEAuto a feu griecht Il Gaharayanakosa तिसु जे अदिट्ठपुव्वा रायकुले गुरुकुले य वेसासु / farm-770-2456 alle Eifa 11 Chappaannayagahao The three things, 1. Vijnana. 2. Jnana and 3. Saundarya are generally associated with rajakula, gurukula and Vesyas respectively. We will have to correct the text accordingly. p. 23 v. 285 The reading quragut is non-sensical. Probably, it is a corruption of or a printing mistake for 96m. p. 23 v. 293 The reading afPS449ER makes no sense. Many works such as Saptasatisara (V. 417, Kalpalataviveka (p. 18), Srngaraprakasa (p.