Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The second chapter deals with the great means of attaining liberation, which are actions involving charity. He considered a large insect to be equal to an elephant in its pride. ||56|| He had great love for fame, which was the foremost of all things. He considered perishable life to be like withered grass. ||57|| He always considered the directions that brought wealth to be his adornment. He was always averse to women. ||58|| He considered the bow bent by the string of virtue to be his helper. He never considered a group of servants who were satisfied with food alone and were harmful to be helpful. ||59|| In his kingdom, even the wind did not take anything from anyone, let alone others. Similarly, even a group of wicked animals did not engage in violence, let alone humans. ||60|| The actions of Hari, i.e., Vishnu, were to destroy the bull-killer, i.e., Vrishaasura, but his actions were not to destroy the bull-killer, i.e., Dharma. Similarly, the glory of Mahadeva, i.e., Shiva, was to cause suffering to the family of King Daksha, but his glory was not to cause suffering to the group of clever people. ||61|| Just as Indra's actions were to destroy the lineage, i.e., mountains, his actions were not to destroy the lineage, i.e., family. And just as the king of the south, Yama, had a great love for punishment, he did not have a great love for punishment. ||62|| Just as Varuna's wealth was free from crocodiles and other wicked aquatic creatures, his wealth was not protected from wicked people, i.e., everyone could enjoy it. And just as it is futile to obtain the proximity of Kubera, i.e., the best treasure, it was not futile to obtain his proximity, i.e., the treasure of virtuous people. ||63|| Just as the Buddha's vision, i.e., the philosophy of reality, was devoid of wealth, his vision, i.e., realization, was not devoid of wealth. And just as the moon is also affected and destroyed by the dark fortnight, his was not affected and destroyed by great faults. ||64|| The beggars could not attain the fullness of his virtue of charity, i.e., there were not enough beggars to receive all the charity he wanted to give. The scriptures could not attain the fullness of his intellect, i.e., his intellect was very great and the scriptures were few. Similarly, Saraswati could not attain the fullness of his poetic power. ||65||