Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Appendix 2
[391
2- Not possible.
NNN
w w w w N
No, because the Dravyavedi women's Kshayik Samyaktv, Samyam, Upsham Samyaktv and both Aharak, if one of these is present, the rest are not. 'Aharaya Doshin' from 17.5, in the state of Apariapta, how can the Upshamik Samyaktv of the Devas be possible? - Aharak and Aharak Mishra should be taken. Because of the impossibility of death of the Kta. It is not appropriate, because the death of those who have Upshamik Samyaktv with Mithyatv as the cause is impossible. Those who have Upshamik Samyaktv with Vedak as the cause, by rule, ascend the Shreni, so the Shreni- 19.7, how can the Navveyakvasi, because of being Ahminndra, die with Charitramoh Upsham, in the state of Apariapta? If so, it is said, some Samyakdrishti, even in the state of Apariapta of the Devas, Upshamik Samyaktv is possible.
He does that, hearing it, another who is there, takes Samyaktv. [Doubt- How can Upshamik Samyaktv be possible for the Devas in the state of Apariapta, because the death of the beings with Upshamik Samyaktv is impossible? Answer- It is not a fault.
It is not right to say so. The beings who attain Upshamik Samyaktv from the Mithyatv guna-sthan, their death is impossible, but those who have Upshamik Samyaktv with Vedak as the cause, they ascend the Shreni by rule. Doubt- Nav Aveyakvasi Devas are Ahminndra, how can they hear Dharma Shravana? Answer- Some Samyakdrishti, hearing it, another who is there, takes Samyaktv. Or, there is no discussion about Praman Nay etc. in them. There is general Tattv Vichar like the Lingi, so the beings who have attained Charitramoh Upsham, die and become Devas by rule. There is no fault. ]
Upshamik Samyaktv is possible even in the state of Apariapta of the Devas.
8.30
20.5 The best state of Sansarik Kshayik Samyaktv is 6. 27
Trayastrishat Sagaropamani. The characteristic of Sagaropama is 18.2, why is the Upshamik Samyaktv of Parihar Shuddhi Samyata not possible? "Dahakoda Kodiyo Palljava, Sa Sayaru Uchai Ekkanaastiti Cheduchyate, Manahparyaya Parihar Shuddhi Upshamik- Tava." Sant Muhurta Ashtavarsha Heen Purvakoti Dwayadhik. Among the Samyaktv Aharakrdhi, if one is possible, the other three are not possible later. The Sansari Vishistta of that is not possible. Because, it is possible. Because, in Manahparyaya, Mithyatv Purvak Upsham- should be prohibited, not Vedak Purvak. It is said- 'Padhvas Du Parimaan Sar Khalu Sadahasakodiyo. 'Manapjjav Pariharo Ubasama Sammataharaya Donni.
Chhappanna Cha Sahasssa Nayavva Vasagananaae. 'Edasi Ekkagave 'Seshanam Sambhavo Natthi. '
Thus, the lifespan of the one who is born with Purvakoti years, after eight years, Aharaya Donni... Aharak Aharak Mishra...
After years, in the inner Muhurta, he destroys Darshan Moh, Kshayik [Why is the Upshamik Samyaktv of Parihar Shuddhi Samyata not possible?
Samyakdrishti is born. He performs Tapascharan, makes all things perfect, not possible? The answer is that Manahparyaya, Parihar
Shuddhi, Upshamik Samyaktv and Aharakrdhi, if one of these is present, the other three are not possible. But
because of the impossibility of staying for a longer time. If it happens, he becomes the beginning of Darshan Moh Kshapana,
then the other three do not cross it, it is said- 'Khavanae Pattayago Jammi Bhave Niyamdo Tado Anna. Nakar
Nakamadi Tinni Bhave Dasanmohammi Khiinami. '
(Pra. Panchasam. 1/203) 1. Go. Ji., Ga. 728. Pra. Panchasam. 11/94 'Natviti Asesayam Jane. ' 2. Pu. Kodisadhasasai. 'Boddhva Vasakodiinam. '-Sarva. Si. Udhrut. Jambu. Pra. 13/1.2