Prakritsarvaswam

SR No.: 001369
Original Sutra Author: Markandey
Author: Krushnachandra Acharya
Publisher: Prakrit Text Society Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 424
Language: Prakrit, Sanskrut, English
Classification: Book_Devnagari & Grammar
File Size: 20 MB

Page 326

-- १७. ३४] १७. ३०. किंयत्तदां तु प्रथमाद्वितीयासप्तमीविधौ ॥ २०१॥ प्राकृतवद्रूपमित्येव । को", के । का, कं । काउ, काओ इत्यादि । एवं यत्तदोः । १७. ३१. दीर्घोऽस्से वा सादेशे स्सर्जिते डसादेशे एषां दी? वा स्यात् । काहो । कोहे । कासु । काहं । काहुँ । एवं यत्तदोः । स्से तुं कस्स, जैस्स ॥ १७. ३२. ... ... ... १७. ३३. यत्तदोऽमा जउं त अमा सह यत्तदोर्जङ तउं स्याताम् । जउं मग्गसि तउं देमि ॥
उडिभ्यां जत्थ तत्थ च ॥ २०२॥ यत्तदोरित्येव । चकारात्पक्षे प्राकृतवत् ॥
57 Mss. add ag before this Sū. which is the result of the con fusion with Su. 56 of this Pada ( vide comm. of Sü. 56-यथा लभइ etc. ) Thus the entire text starting from वृक्षादौ of XII. 8, comm. has been written in a most confused and distorted condition in all the four Mss. The scribe who first copied the text is responsible for such confusion. B reads 'स्टे for स्से ; UGस ; IOस; em. according to Mss which seem to be correct here.
58 IO om. 59 BGIO 40% ; U = ; em. is mine ; cf, Su. 21. 60 U तस्मउ ; G स उ ; B स्टे तु the readings of Mss. will show that the affix is not -रटे but -स्म.
61 B कस्ट, जस्ट ; U कम्य, ज( १ )स्स ; IO कस्य, जस.
62 This Sū. which is supposed to be in the original text, is thus left blank by B; Mss. do not preserve this rule.
63 Bजत्तिं तत्ति which is not authorised by Mss. UG have the reading as suggested above with slight mistake in तउ which they read as मतलं, but this mistake is corrected in ex. IO preserve the reading of UG in corrupt from: I जम मतङ्म: 0 जङ तङ; ex. also same. जउ and तउ are used in colloquial Oriya. So the reading of Mss. seem to be correct.
64 U उसिउस्भ्यां यत उत उत च ; Gउसिउस्भ्यां जउ तउच; TO उसिडिम्यां यत च उत च. The Mss. seem to be corrupt with regard to this Su. Firstly if we retain the reading of any of them, there will be viola