Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
To understand how little authenticity is created, one does not need to go far from the students of all current Jain institutions. On the path of knowledge, in the realm of inquiry, and in the quest for truth, there is a place for the wheel of reasoning, i.e., for the view of reduction or sectarianism, yet the fundamental reality is not established. Those who are scared merely from comparative thoughts are doubtful about the strength and authenticity of the father's side. On the opposite side, the one who stands has less capacity, as they hesitate to abandon falsehood and accept the truth, and they do not possess the enmity and intelligence required to prove the genuine matter of the father. Knowledge means overcoming constraints, bonds, and illusions to expand the self and dive deeper into the truth. For this reason, I present the following method before the teachers. They should not consider this method as a final instruction; instead, they can modify it based on their experience and prepare themselves genuinely, using their students as the means.
1. Take the first fundamental sutra and derive its direct meaning.
2. Teach one of the two commentaries, either the Bhāṣya or the Sarvārthasiddhi, as the primary one, and then immediately convey the other. In this reading, the students' attention should be drawn to the following specific points: (4) Which aspects are similar in the Bhāṣya and the Sarvārthasiddhi? And despite being similar, what are the differences in language and exposition method?